Matthew1344
Puritan Board Sophomore
As far as i understand the 1689 confession, i summit to it. I looked it over before in this table http://www.proginosko.com/docs/wcf_lbcf.html . It was very helpful, and at the end, I was still on the 1689 side.
currently I have been listening and reading cov theo from the paedo view point.
Covenant Theology – Dr. Curt Daniel
Overview of Covenant Theology 1-3 – Dr. Matthew McMahon SA
Covenant Theology 1-9 – Dr. Richard Phillips
Covenant Church – Dr. Richard Phillips
Covenant Worship 1 and 2 – Dr. Richard Phillips
Biblical Theology 1-26 – Dr. Gerard Van Groningen
The Covenant of Redemption – Dr. Curt Daniel
Covenant Theology 1-4 – Dr. O. Palmer Robertson
Covenant Theology 1-5 – Dr. Michael Barrett SA
The Doctrine of the Two Covenants – Ezekiel Hopkins
A History of the Work of Redemption – Jonathan Edwards
Some was making sense, and some was not. I have learned that there is more to this line of thinking than i originally thought.
I was talking to my friend and he introduced me to the www.1689federalist.com website. They are challenging me pretty heavily. Especially the young guy, he doesn't make too many things simple. He does a great job at speaking clearly and getting his point across. The difficulty is due to my end, always having to push pause, replay the term in my head, then remember what the definition of the term is. I am trying to figure out if these guys are speaking truth about baptist theology or if i am really a baptist.
One guy said in a video "Many people try to learn covenant theology from paedo teachers and try to make their baptist theology fit into it, but it doesn't fit." This is me, except i don't see why it can't fit. He also said something along the lines of "1689 baptist are different in sacraments that WCF, but they didn't differ starting at sacramentology, they differed starting in covenant theology."
Anyways, i say all that to ask this to my reformed Baptist brothers on here...
1)Do you believe in a Covenant of Works before the Fall? Why or why not?
2)And if Adam would have been with ought sin in the probationary period, would he have been given a glorified body?
currently I have been listening and reading cov theo from the paedo view point.
Covenant Theology – Dr. Curt Daniel
Overview of Covenant Theology 1-3 – Dr. Matthew McMahon SA
Covenant Theology 1-9 – Dr. Richard Phillips
Covenant Church – Dr. Richard Phillips
Covenant Worship 1 and 2 – Dr. Richard Phillips
Biblical Theology 1-26 – Dr. Gerard Van Groningen
The Covenant of Redemption – Dr. Curt Daniel
Covenant Theology 1-4 – Dr. O. Palmer Robertson
Covenant Theology 1-5 – Dr. Michael Barrett SA
The Doctrine of the Two Covenants – Ezekiel Hopkins
A History of the Work of Redemption – Jonathan Edwards
Some was making sense, and some was not. I have learned that there is more to this line of thinking than i originally thought.
I was talking to my friend and he introduced me to the www.1689federalist.com website. They are challenging me pretty heavily. Especially the young guy, he doesn't make too many things simple. He does a great job at speaking clearly and getting his point across. The difficulty is due to my end, always having to push pause, replay the term in my head, then remember what the definition of the term is. I am trying to figure out if these guys are speaking truth about baptist theology or if i am really a baptist.
One guy said in a video "Many people try to learn covenant theology from paedo teachers and try to make their baptist theology fit into it, but it doesn't fit." This is me, except i don't see why it can't fit. He also said something along the lines of "1689 baptist are different in sacraments that WCF, but they didn't differ starting at sacramentology, they differed starting in covenant theology."
Anyways, i say all that to ask this to my reformed Baptist brothers on here...
1)Do you believe in a Covenant of Works before the Fall? Why or why not?
2)And if Adam would have been with ought sin in the probationary period, would he have been given a glorified body?