Sebastian Heck
Puritan Board Freshman
What role should our view of Baptism (paedo- vs. credo) play with respect to the second mark of any true church: the right (i.e. biblical) administration of the sacraments?
Does it make a difference whether a church practices infant baptism (Romish, Lutheran, Reformed, Federal Vision, etc.) or credobaptism (Anabaptist, Baptist etc.), as long as it practices Christian (Trinitarian) baptism, it is a true church?
What do you think? (Mind you, I am NOT discussing baptism per se here, only the question whether our view of baptism informs the second mark of the church!)
Does it make a difference whether a church practices infant baptism (Romish, Lutheran, Reformed, Federal Vision, etc.) or credobaptism (Anabaptist, Baptist etc.), as long as it practices Christian (Trinitarian) baptism, it is a true church?
What do you think? (Mind you, I am NOT discussing baptism per se here, only the question whether our view of baptism informs the second mark of the church!)