Doulos McKenzie
Puritan Board Freshman
Just wondering y'all's thoughts.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
many of those holding to Dospensationalism still would agree on the justification of the Cross as Reformed would, but think those in FV have a different justification model, correct?Just wondering y'all's thoughts.
FV is more dangerous to theology. Dispensationalism is more dangerous to the Church.
could you elaborate?
Nailed it.FV is more dangerous to theology. Dispensationalism is more dangerous to the Church.
I came out from those circles, and can say that a majority of the Christians who are still really into it were not seeing it as being saved bylaw and now Grace, but more dividing what the church and Israel now still is...Hmm, I'm not sure I agree that Dispensationalism is more dangerous to the church than the FV. The FV is the most divisive doctrinal dispute I have ever personally experienced. It even separates previously close friends. The FV's doctrine of the church is very problematic, being a rather authoritarian version of church government. I have seen case after case of church power being abused. And yes, while Dispensationalists believe that there are two peoples of God, which is highly problematic, I can usually get along better with them than with ANY FV supporter.
How so though? as they still would see the church as being made up of both Jews and Gentiles, just see still a distinction between Israel and Church?FV ruins the doctrine of salvation. Dispensationalism ruins the doctrine of the church
How so though? as they still would see the church as being made up of both Jews and Gentiles, just see still a distinction between Israel and Church?
How so though? as they still would see the church as being made up of both Jews and Gentiles, just see still a distinction between Israel and Church?
I was raised up and taught on it though, and was always taught that there has only been one way to get saved, that being the Cross of Christ...
No, as he always had the church in mind, as it was destined to start at Pentacost....Did God fall back on Plan B?
One right now....How many peoples of God are there?
One right now....
Since there has always been just one way to be saved, would there not be just one people of God?One always. Past Present and Future. If that is denied then by definition you are not Reformed.
The FV is the most divisive doctrinal dispute I have ever personally experienced...I can usually get along better with them than with ANY FV supporter.
One right now....
Since there has always been just one way to be saved, would there not be just one people of God?
could you elaborate?
I will say dispensationalism has done the most damage and continues to do so.
I have never meet any one who holds to the FV.
Just trying (and failing) to add a little levity to the current discussion....Not really sure what you mean?
Think that most of my friends who are still in Dispensational churches would disagree with trying to force a takeover though....You have, perhaps inadvertently, proven my point. While a good FV heretic may get in your face and otherwise make himself (I haven't run across any leading FV women) unwelcome, the Dispensationalists are going to be winsome infiltrators, eager to volunteer and help out, as they sneak into leadership roles and subvert the Church over time.