My acquaintance has been rambling on about Allan Kardec's non-sense (a form of Spiritism) to me in my Facebook page about Moses being a medium, hell not being real, Satan and demons not existing, the Bible being adulterated, and arguing for reincarnation.
He provides no intelligent argumentation for his ideas; he only makes affirmations. He's more of the ignorant type of individual. I already showed him the Bible teaches about hell, Satan and demons, but I eventually noticed he doesn't care about what the Bible teaches, given that he believes it has been modified and since he is committed to his Spiritist-ocultic experiences, which is extremely common in Brazil.
(1) What do you all suggest? I don't have much experience in this kind of situation. Should I stop arguing with him on my Facebook page? Should I give a final answer about all this and then stop arguing? Should I mention other important points on this issue?
(2) By the way, what Reformed and non-Reformed works are there which refute Spiritism, Allan Kardec's ideas, and reincarnation (in its various forms, e.g. from Kardeism or Hinduism, etc.).
Thanks
He provides no intelligent argumentation for his ideas; he only makes affirmations. He's more of the ignorant type of individual. I already showed him the Bible teaches about hell, Satan and demons, but I eventually noticed he doesn't care about what the Bible teaches, given that he believes it has been modified and since he is committed to his Spiritist-ocultic experiences, which is extremely common in Brazil.
(1) What do you all suggest? I don't have much experience in this kind of situation. Should I stop arguing with him on my Facebook page? Should I give a final answer about all this and then stop arguing? Should I mention other important points on this issue?
(2) By the way, what Reformed and non-Reformed works are there which refute Spiritism, Allan Kardec's ideas, and reincarnation (in its various forms, e.g. from Kardeism or Hinduism, etc.).
Thanks