Not sure about any consistent differences between North and South, but I will say Dabney is particularly helpful on the issue of modern textual criticism. He’s probably the main reason I think the way I think on it.Is it fair to say that the Southern Presbyterians differed as a whole on this topic from the Princeton men, or was Dabney an anomaly? I can check out this article if I can find it, but I have not read Dabney, et al on the topic.