Ergun Caner has himself tasered

Status
Not open for further replies.

Josiah

Puritan Board Senior
[video=youtube;agjV0tbktvQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=agjV0tbktvQ&feature=related[/video]

wow.
 
What a moron. What was the point he was trying to make??? That being an anabaptist makes about as much sense as allowing oneself to be zapped???
 
Watch the related clip "Ergun Caner gets tased, brother". At the 00:50 mark you can clearly hear the guy who is making the video chuckle and say, "What an idiot..."

I'd agree with that opinion.
 
I have heard of man made revivals but this is ridiculous.

Or is 50,000 volts the impetus behind being 'slain in the spirit'?
 
[video=youtube;o5OQcIHKOF0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o5OQcIHKOF0&feature=related[/video]

He could apply for a job on the power team :lol:
 
Normally Im against tasers but if it helps stop Ergun Caner from spreading heresy I might be ok with it. Especially when its self inflicted :)
 
Where I live if the cops want to carry tazers they have to allow them selves to be tazered so they will know what it is like and will not go around tazering everybody. Maybe he is going to go around tazering people for Jesus or tazering those Calvinists he hates so much.
 
He knows were preparing for a calvinistic jihad influenced by arminian evangelical/ and catholic intervention in the christian church!!!
 
Normally Im against tasers but if it helps stop Ergun Caner from spreading heresy I might be ok with it. Especially when its self inflicted :)
It was meant to communicate a message. If you guys had listened to what he had to say afterwards, you would have understood his point.

As for Caner spreading heresy, I disagree with this. He is more of a Sandy Creek Baptist than a Charleston Baptist. I'll listen to him before I listen to Joel "Dr. Feelgood" Osteen.
 
What a moron. What was the point he was trying to make??? That being an anabaptist makes about as much sense as allowing oneself to be zapped???

tazed and confused....

Watch the related clip "Ergun Caner gets tased, brother". At the 00:50 mark you can clearly hear the guy who is making the video chuckle and say, "What an idiot..."

I'd agree with that opinion.


:lol:


:agree:
Not my idea of a fun time. :eek::2cents:
 
Jason,
I beg to differ. He is a blatent arminian and hates calvinism. Stating its worse than Islam!!
I've watched his lectures on the History of Baptists from Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary's Distance Learning Program. I think he has a case there. He was a Muslim at one time. He also referenced back to Leonard Verduin's The Reformers and Their Stepchildren. Calvin, Luther, Beza, et. al. had little tolerance for the Anabaptists because they refused to put their children through State-mandated paedobaptism (which was used solely for taxation, not redemptive, purposes).
 
How on earth does he have case over one situation in the past? That does not make sense to me.

If these lectures are online could you send me a link?
 
Jason,
I beg to differ. He is a blatent arminian and s calvinism. Stating its worse than Islam!!
I've watched his lectures on the History of Baptists from Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary's Distance Learning Program. I think he has a case there. He was a Muslim at one time. He also referenced back to Leonard Verduin's The Reformers and Their Stepchildren. Calvin, Luther, Beza, et. al. had little tolerance for the Anabaptists because they refused to put their children through State-mandated paedobaptism (which was used solely for taxation, not redemptive, purposes).

While the attitude of the Reformers to anabaptists was not Calvinisms finest hour it is revisionism in the extreme to suggest that this attitude was rooted in taxation.

Anabaptism was not by any stretch of the imagination what today would be seen as orthodox baptist belief. It involved a rejection of the Church both in function and authority.

To say that Calvins attitude to anabaptism and paedobaptism was based on taxation (and by the way Zwingli made Calvin look like a liberal in this area) is really quite offensive.

Do you really mean to say that someone who believes that Calvinism is worse than Islam has a point?
 
As for Caner spreading heresy, I disagree with this. He is more of a Sandy Creek Baptist than a Charleston Baptist. I'll listen to him before I listen to Joel "Dr. Feelgood" Osteen.

:think: I dunno. I think given a choice I would listen to neither. I dont think it is profitable to be under the teaching or hearing of any false teacher, it is actually quite the opposite.

It was meant to communicate a message. If you guys had listened to what he had to say afterwards, you would have understood his point.

Perhaps it is worthwhile to note what the WLC has to say about such "communication":

WLC Q. 136: What are the sins forbidden in the sixth commandment?
A. The sins forbidden in the sixth commandment are, all taking away the life of ourselves, or of others, except in case of public justice, lawful war, or necessary defense; the neglecting or withdrawing the lawful and necessary means of preservation of life; sinful anger, hatred, envy, desire of revenge; all excessive passions, distracting cares; immoderate use of meat, drink, labor, and recreations; provoking words, oppression, quarreling, striking, wounding, and whatsoever else tends to the destruction of the life of any.

In my humble opinion anyone that abuses the temple of the holy spirit is not worth listening to, but praying for. :2cents:
 
As for Caner spreading heresy, I disagree with this. He is more of a Sandy Creek Baptist than a Charleston Baptist. I'll listen to him before I listen to Joel "Dr. Feelgood" Osteen.

:think: I dunno. I think given a choice I would listen to neither. I dont think it is profitable to be under the teaching or hearing of any false teacher, it is actually quite the opposite.

It was meant to communicate a message. If you guys had listened to what he had to say afterwards, you would have understood his point.

Perhaps it is worthwhile to note what the WLC has to say about such "communication":

WLC Q. 136: What are the sins forbidden in the sixth commandment?
A. The sins forbidden in the sixth commandment are, all taking away the life of ourselves, or of others, except in case of public justice, lawful war, or necessary defense; the neglecting or withdrawing the lawful and necessary means of preservation of life; sinful anger, hatred, envy, desire of revenge; all excessive passions, distracting cares; immoderate use of meat, drink, labor, and recreations; provoking words, oppression, quarreling, striking, wounding, and whatsoever else tends to the destruction of the life of any.
In my humble opinion anyone that abuses the temple of the holy spirit is not worth listening to, but praying for. :2cents:
In all honesty, I don't even pay attention to the WLC or WSC anymore. (I adhere more to the 1677/89, but even that is not the Bible itself.) The answers are in Scripture, not a Confession. Confessions are a display of a systematic belief system. I will let the Bible speak for itself, TYVM.

I disagree with your assertion that Caner is a false teacher. Was he off-base for the tasing incident? Probably. False teacher? Definitely not. He has even admitted that there are Calvinistic faculty members at LBTS. In other words,, they are able to work together.

Let me ask you this question: Do you know the difference between a Charleston Baptist and a Sandy Creek Baptist?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top