bouletheou
Puritan Board Freshman
New info which is building on the information given in the previous post here:
Johannes Weslianus: MNY Presbytery Missionary Ron Choong on Why the WCF's View of Adam Must be Revised
TE White has followed up on his post on Ron Choong, an MNY Presbytery missonary sponsored by Reddeemer NYC.
Daniel Mann, a Bible teacher in NY, has written a response to Choong's view:
"In February 2010, my wife and attended a Ron Choong (Academy for Christian Thought) seminar at Redeemer Presbyterian Church, NYC, on the doctrine of humanity. Choong concluded, 'Adam and Eve were probably collective names describing a community of hominids [pre-humans] selected by God for
moral cognition.' As innocuous to the Christian faith as this statement might sound, it contradicts NT teaching and consequently, the credibility of the entire Bible."
You can read the rest here:
Johannes Weslianus: Helpful Response to Ron Choong by Bible Teacher Daniel Mann
Choong has also responded to Mann. He writes:
"If by copying Tim Keller and Terry Gyger, you hope to draw their attention to my views, I can save you a lot of trouble. All my views about Adam and Eve have been published for more than 10 years and Redeemer as a church as well as Dr Keller as a minister have never had any objections to my non-
doctrinal interpretations. This means that while I hold to a certain view of who Adam might mean, no church doctrine in the history of the church has ever made this a litmus test of faith."
Johannes Weslianus: Ron Choong's Reply to Daniel Mann's Criticism of Choong's Theistic Evolution
Johannes Weslianus: MNY Presbytery Missionary Ron Choong on Why the WCF's View of Adam Must be Revised
TE White has followed up on his post on Ron Choong, an MNY Presbytery missonary sponsored by Reddeemer NYC.
Daniel Mann, a Bible teacher in NY, has written a response to Choong's view:
"In February 2010, my wife and attended a Ron Choong (Academy for Christian Thought) seminar at Redeemer Presbyterian Church, NYC, on the doctrine of humanity. Choong concluded, 'Adam and Eve were probably collective names describing a community of hominids [pre-humans] selected by God for
moral cognition.' As innocuous to the Christian faith as this statement might sound, it contradicts NT teaching and consequently, the credibility of the entire Bible."
You can read the rest here:
Johannes Weslianus: Helpful Response to Ron Choong by Bible Teacher Daniel Mann
Choong has also responded to Mann. He writes:
"If by copying Tim Keller and Terry Gyger, you hope to draw their attention to my views, I can save you a lot of trouble. All my views about Adam and Eve have been published for more than 10 years and Redeemer as a church as well as Dr Keller as a minister have never had any objections to my non-
doctrinal interpretations. This means that while I hold to a certain view of who Adam might mean, no church doctrine in the history of the church has ever made this a litmus test of faith."
Johannes Weslianus: Ron Choong's Reply to Daniel Mann's Criticism of Choong's Theistic Evolution