Who are the top 5 contemporary reformed authors in your opinion?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Is Keller reformed, I don't see it? Frame denies the RPW!

Being in the PCA doesn't make one reformed...

Well I suppose it all goes back to determining what that means. If you take some version of Dr. Clark's view, then those two would probably be excluded from having that label. But with how Dr. Frame uses the term (see his review of Clark's book for an example), then surely they would be. Obviously, he doesn't take the position of the Wesminster divines on the RPW, so if that is essential to being Reformed, then no. But certainly he has been a very influential writer in the Reformed world for quite a while, whether or not all of his positions are Reformed or biblical.

What specifically in Tim Keller's teaching do you think is not Reformed? I'm no expert on Keller, but off the top of my head, the only thing that jumps out is his view of creationism, etc., though if I'm not mistaken, even Dr. Clark doesn't think that should determine whether someone is Reformed or not. I'm not challenging your view of Keller, I'm just curious, as I haven't had a huge amount of exposure to his writings.
 
Top Ten :worms: in the reformed camp - who ya got? Go!

1. Tim Keller
2. Sabbatarianism
3. Baptism
4. YEC v. OEC
5. Whether Adam had a belly button. (Credit to my wife.)
6. Presuppositionalism v. Evidentialism
7. R.J. Rushdoony (Theonomy)
8. Greg Bahnsen (Theonomy again.)
9. Pot?
10. Rat brains (I ran out of material at #9, obviously.)

You forgot about how many angels can dance on the head of a needle.....and as to the Top Five, where is Rick Warren?!?!
 
TOO MANY! Gee, I wish ya'll had not done that list thing. Too many I haven't read yet! My Bucket list of Books / Authors is already way too full!
 
I honestly can't stand reading Piper. It is something about his style. I can only read 40 or so pages before I just put it away.

I'm with you! I never finished Let the Nations Be Glad. Reading Piper can be like (there are exceptions) watching someone chew a nice, big, juicy steak that you really would like to enjoy for yourself. He tends to repeat himself and look at things from every possible angle. Thankfully, his preaching is not like that!

I think everyone's named all the people in my list! Don't forget blogs though...what would the Young, Restless, and Reformed movement be without the internet?!

Tim Challies
Justin Taylor
Ray Ortlund
Green Baggins!
Um...some....Pilgrim Board?? Pelican Board? Uhh??

Okay, this is embarrassing! I made it on to a top 5 list? You gotta be kidding!
 
In no particular order...

Winzer
Keister
Buchanan
L.
Rafalsky
Zartman
Johnson
Hicks
Coldwell
Severson

to name a few...
 
I see that several have mentioned Trueman. He hasn't written a lot, and the little that I have read didn't strike me as particularly impressive.

Is there something really great that he has written that I have missed?
 
In no particular order...

Winzer
Keister
Buchanan
L.
Rafalsky
Zartman
Johnson
Hicks
Coldwell
Severson

to name a few...

Hicks just quotes other people a lot.

:D :p

'Quoting' is a big part of the Reformed tradition. Besides, he is responsible, I believe, for the notion of 'rat brains'. Although it is not 'yet fully orbed', promises to be an important nuance to the Reformed paradigm.
 
I see that several have mentioned Trueman. He hasn't written a lot, and the little that I have read didn't strike me as particularly impressive.

Is there something really great that he has written that I have missed?

His series of posts on Martin Luther is free and I thought it was very good.
This is the first one. If you go back through his posts from there it shouldn't be hard to find the whole series.
 
I am not very well read, but i do like Sproul, Horton and Sinclair Ferguson.

---------- Post added at 04:46 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:45 PM ----------

I honestly can't stand reading Piper. It is something about his style. I can only read 40 or so pages before I just put it away.

I am glad someone else feels this way, I have found him to be very difficult to listen to or read. I was wondering if it was just me or what...
 
I like R. C. Sproul, Michael Horton, Carl Trueman ,Sinclair Ferguson and Anthony N.S. Lane
 
The main purpose of the Gospel for keller is to change the culture.

Hmm, can you provide some citations or references on this? I'm not trying to be a pro-Kellerite here or something, I'm not particularly familiar with his work. But in the stuff that I have read of his, he's seemed pretty clear on the gospel and its purpose. Clearly, he indicates that the gospel, when applied in the lives of God's people, ought to change the culture. But I'm not sure that that's something particularly new, nor outside of the Reformed tradition (Kuyper, Bavinck, and others). I'd be interested to see where he's ever said that that is the main purpose of the gospel.
 
look at things from every possible angle.

This can get somewhat redundant, but I think for shear ability to get others to think critically (from every angle) about an issue he is definitely a keeper. I love to read him, you just have to not read every page of his books because of this but for the most part very helpful in my opinion.
 
Puritan Board law #6: In any thread in which admiration for people are expressed, the only sustained conversation will be about what's wrong with some of the persons mentioned.

BTW, Dudley, as a church history guy, I love Anthony Lane. What a mind for detail.
 
The main purpose of the Gospel for keller is to change the culture.

Hmm, can you provide some citations or references on this? I'm not trying to be a pro-Kellerite here or something, I'm not particularly familiar with his work. But in the stuff that I have read of his, he's seemed pretty clear on the gospel and its purpose. Clearly, he indicates that the gospel, when applied in the lives of God's people, ought to change the culture. But I'm not sure that that's something particularly new, nor outside of the Reformed tradition (Kuyper, Bavinck, and others). I'd be interested to see where he's ever said that that is the main purpose of the gospel.

Well, I have gone and looked up where I knew this from. It was an audio recording, but I have been asked not to post it. So you can do two things with what I said... You can either forget what I said and believe Keller doesn't actually teach anything like that OR you can search keller's teaching yourself to see where he clearly teaches that the Gospel's purpose is to transform the city/culture.
 
Well, I have gone and looked up where I knew this from. It was an audio recording, but I have been asked not to post it. So you can do two things with what I said... You can either forget what I said and believe Keller doesn't actually teach anything like that OR you can search keller's teaching yourself to see where he clearly teaches that the Gospel's purpose is to transform the city/culture.

Ok, well, it's not that I had a problem with looking stuff up on my own, I just figured it would be helpful to have a citation/direction, since he's written and taught a lot. But anyhow, I will go do some searching. Though you may be intrigued by this comment, which seems fairly clear (posted after I asked you the question, fyi).
 
Tim Keller is rumored to like cats. (If you'll refer to Calvin's Institutes, 2nd Book, p. 673, paragraph 3, 2nd sentence, it states explicitly that Roman Catholics like cats, whereas Christians like dogs.)
 
Puritan Board law #6: In any thread in which admiration for people are expressed, the only sustained conversation will be about what's wrong with some of the persons mentioned.

Excuse me, Charlie, I believe that's actually #8.
 
Tim Keller is rumored to like cats. (If you'll refer to Calvin's Institutes, 2nd Book, p. 673, paragraph 3, 2nd sentence, it states explicitly that Roman Catholics like cats, whereas Christians like dogs.)

Then we've got enough evidence for a speedy trial, no? Who's bringing wood, who's bringing oil, and who's got marshmallows?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top