Here is a video produced by Nova that features a scientist who has discovered soft tissue in dinosaur bones: NOVA | T. Rex Blood?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
but Schweitzer has found evidence of delicate structures such as blood vessels and red blood cells that have survived for millions of years.
but Schweitzer has found evidence of delicate structures such as blood vessels and red blood cells that have survived for millions of years.
Rather than follow evidence that defies theory, they accept the impossible in order to conform with it.
but Schweitzer has found evidence of delicate structures such as blood vessels and red blood cells that have survived for millions of years.
Rather than follow evidence that defies theory, they accept the impossible in order to conform with it.
but Schweitzer has found evidence of delicate structures such as blood vessels and red blood cells that have survived for millions of years.
Rather than follow evidence that defies theory, they accept the impossible in order to conform with it.
Is there a dating method that can find the age of a blood vessel or a red blood cell?
So what does this mean?
Thanks!
Signed, Clueless
So what does this mean?
Thanks!
Signed, Clueless
So what does this mean?
Thanks!
Signed, Clueless
Clueless - It strongly suggests that these dinosaurs lived much more recently than the evolutionists want us to believe. It's very difficult to believe that actual animal flesh & DNA could have remained to this day in these animals if they died millions of years ago. These kinds of finds clearly suggest that these animals died much more recently thus destroying the evolutionary time table. But, these evolutionists continuw to deny the evidence.
Old earth censoring, I can not even watch this video due to region restrictions.
"now do not wake up those europeans we have them lulled to sleep with evolution we only need to fool the americans then we are good."
Comment that could have been uttered by dawkins
but Schweitzer has found evidence of delicate structures such as blood vessels and red blood cells that have survived for millions of years.
Rather than follow evidence that defies theory, they accept the impossible in order to conform with it.
They want creationists to back up their claims with evidence. If this evidence is not good enough, then what would be good evidence?
Old earth censoring, I can not even watch this video due to region restrictions.
"now do not wake up those europeans we have them lulled to sleep with evolution we only need to fool the americans then we are good."
Comment that could have been uttered by dawkins
Old World censoring. But you can read the transcript.
Very interesting. The evolutionary paradigm will change eventually, but it's a process, lasting hopefully not millions of years!
but Schweitzer has found evidence of delicate structures such as blood vessels and red blood cells that have survived for millions of years.
Rather than follow evidence that defies theory, they accept the impossible in order to conform with it.
They want creationists to back up their claims with evidence. If this evidence is not good enough, then what would be good evidence?
Well, obviously, in a chance random universe this is exactly what we'd expect. That's all it proves.
Old earth censoring, I can not even watch this video due to region restrictions.
"now do not wake up those europeans we have them lulled to sleep with evolution we only need to fool the americans then we are good."
Comment that could have been uttered by dawkins
Old World censoring. But you can read the transcript.
Very interesting. The evolutionary paradigm will change eventually, but it's a process, lasting hopefully not millions of years!
Ha! Maybe, if ya'll found Nessie it would expedite the process.
but Schweitzer has found evidence of delicate structures such as blood vessels and red blood cells that have survived for millions of years.
Rather than follow evidence that defies theory, they accept the impossible in order to conform with it.
They want creationists to back up their claims with evidence. If this evidence is not good enough, then what would be good evidence?
Well, obviously, in a chance random universe this is exactly what we'd expect. That's all it proves.
Evolutionists don't have to believe in a chance random universe; they could believe in determinism.