biblelighthouse
Puritan Board Junior
I have been reading "Candid reasons for renouncing the principles of anti-paedobaptism" by Pastor Peter Edwards. (Edwards was a Baptist minister for 10 years before finally realizing that paedobaptism is Biblical!)
It is a great book, with excellent Scriptural arguments for infant baptism.
Nevertheless, I happened upon a quote in the book that was just too much . . . I cracked up! I hope you get a grin out of it too:
It is a great book, with excellent Scriptural arguments for infant baptism.
Nevertheless, I happened upon a quote in the book that was just too much . . . I cracked up! I hope you get a grin out of it too:
Well, and what then? Why, according to Mr. Booth the argument will run thus: the priests were changed, and the role of worship was changed, therefore the church was essentially altered, therefore infants were excluded. Is not this a good inference, The priests were changed, therefore infants were excommunicated? It might have been so, if the priests had all been infants; but even then it would only have concluded against infant priests. . . .