For my fellow credo brethren: would you accept an adult for the Lord's Supper if they had only been baptized by sprinkling or pouring under the following separate circumstances. I have my opinion but I am interested in yours:
1) Baptized as an infant, have not been baptized post-confession of faith
2) Baptized by sprinkling or pouring as an adult post-confession of faith
This is also under the assumption that the baptism took place in a Bible believing church such as one of our Presbyterian brethren's church and the adult has now made a credible confession of faith. Also assumed is that they are not seeking membership at your church. For any Presbyterian brethren who are unaware of Baptist practice, it is generally accepted among most (but not all) Baptists that a person has to have been baptized "properly" (as in by immersion) to partake of the Lord's Supper. Thoughts?
1) Baptized as an infant, have not been baptized post-confession of faith
2) Baptized by sprinkling or pouring as an adult post-confession of faith
This is also under the assumption that the baptism took place in a Bible believing church such as one of our Presbyterian brethren's church and the adult has now made a credible confession of faith. Also assumed is that they are not seeking membership at your church. For any Presbyterian brethren who are unaware of Baptist practice, it is generally accepted among most (but not all) Baptists that a person has to have been baptized "properly" (as in by immersion) to partake of the Lord's Supper. Thoughts?