Reformed Covenanter
Cancelled Commissioner
Years ago, I recall seeing it argued that Ruth was not really a Moabite but a backslidden Israelite and so her marriage to Boaz was not an example of an Israelite marrying an "alien". Thomas Aquinas quotes Ambrose to the contrary (I am not sure what the source of the quotation is. Perhaps it is Ambrose's Commentary on Luke, but the edition of Catena Aurea in Mattheum that I am reading usually gives the reference to that source):
AMBROSE. But how did Ruth who was an alien marry a man that was a Jew? and wherefore in Christ’s genealogy did his Evangelist so much as mention a union, which in the eye of the law was bastard? Thus the Saviour’s birth of a parentage not admitted by the law appears to us monstrous, until we attend to that declaration of the Apostle, The law was not given for the righteous, but for the unrighteous (1 Tim 1:9).
For this woman who was an alien, a Moabitess, a nation with whom the Mosaic law forbad all intermarriage, and shut them totally out of the Church, how did she enter into the Church, unless that she were holy and unstained in her life above the law? Therefore she was exempt from this restriction of the law, and deserved to be numbered in the Lord’s lineage, chosen from the kindred of her mind, not of her body. To us she is a great example, for that in her was prefigured the entrance into the Lord’s Church of all of us who are gathered out of the Gentiles.
Quoted in Thomas Aquinas, Catena Aurea in Mattheum: The Golden Chain on Matthew (1263), C1, L3.
Has anyone here seen the original source? I would like to track it down for a future blog post.
P.S. The source is the Commentary on Luke because the parallel Latin text says Super Luc.
AMBROSE. But how did Ruth who was an alien marry a man that was a Jew? and wherefore in Christ’s genealogy did his Evangelist so much as mention a union, which in the eye of the law was bastard? Thus the Saviour’s birth of a parentage not admitted by the law appears to us monstrous, until we attend to that declaration of the Apostle, The law was not given for the righteous, but for the unrighteous (1 Tim 1:9).
For this woman who was an alien, a Moabitess, a nation with whom the Mosaic law forbad all intermarriage, and shut them totally out of the Church, how did she enter into the Church, unless that she were holy and unstained in her life above the law? Therefore she was exempt from this restriction of the law, and deserved to be numbered in the Lord’s lineage, chosen from the kindred of her mind, not of her body. To us she is a great example, for that in her was prefigured the entrance into the Lord’s Church of all of us who are gathered out of the Gentiles.
Quoted in Thomas Aquinas, Catena Aurea in Mattheum: The Golden Chain on Matthew (1263), C1, L3.
Has anyone here seen the original source? I would like to track it down for a future blog post.
P.S. The source is the Commentary on Luke because the parallel Latin text says Super Luc.
Last edited: