Justified
Puritan Board Sophomore
I read another thread on the aforementioned topic, but could not find a particularly satisfying answer. What exactly did the Reformed divines mean when they said that our knowledge of God was an analogical knowledge. Analogy is tricky concept. Often how I hear analogy explained (relative to this discussion) ends up making our knowledge of God equivocal.
Is analogy conceived of as some degree of similarity in the things we say about God (a sliver of univocity) and a degree of dissimilarity in the same statement (a sliver of equivocation)?
Is analogy conceived of as some degree of similarity in the things we say about God (a sliver of univocity) and a degree of dissimilarity in the same statement (a sliver of equivocation)?