Andrew P.C.
Puritan Board Junior
It seems to me that our Reformed Baptist brethren are trying to make their position more agreeable to traditional CT than it really is (yeah I know I ended with "is"). One major factor is that reformed baptists equate the CoG with the New Covnenat, denying the overall CoG throughout scripture. This is a major difference and one not to be ignored.
As a side, I really do not like the 1689 Federalism website because of the many inaccuracies and blatant historical revisionism. For example, John Owen doesn't agree with 1689 Federalism, yet, they claim he does. I'm not an Owen expert, but Owen was a savoy man which is not cohesive with 1689 by any stretch.
As a side, I really do not like the 1689 Federalism website because of the many inaccuracies and blatant historical revisionism. For example, John Owen doesn't agree with 1689 Federalism, yet, they claim he does. I'm not an Owen expert, but Owen was a savoy man which is not cohesive with 1689 by any stretch.