SeanAnderson
Puritan Board Freshman
I've been reading Junius' notes on Revelation in the 1599 Geneva Bible, and he makes a compelling historicist case.
There were others at the time with very similar interpretations: https://creationconcept.wordpress.com/2012/05/20/richard-baxter-on-the-millennium/
The position is technically postmillennial, since the the millennium has already been fulfilled, but all of the postmillennialists I come across today believe that the millennium is a golden age yet to come, immediately followed by the final judgment. Therefore, is it correct to call Junius' position postmillennial?
There were others at the time with very similar interpretations: https://creationconcept.wordpress.com/2012/05/20/richard-baxter-on-the-millennium/
The position is technically postmillennial, since the the millennium has already been fulfilled, but all of the postmillennialists I come across today believe that the millennium is a golden age yet to come, immediately followed by the final judgment. Therefore, is it correct to call Junius' position postmillennial?