Arminian Romans Commentary?

Discussion in 'Commentaries' started by KMK, Apr 30, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. KMK

    KMK Administrator Staff Member

    What would be the most representative Arminian work on Rom 9?
  2. BayouHuguenot

    BayouHuguenot Puritan Board Doctor

    While not officially Arminian, Origen gives a decent discussion and he anticipated all of the later synergist arguments.
  3. Stephen L Smith

    Stephen L Smith Moderator Staff Member

    John Wesley’s Explanatory Notes on Romans
  4. arapahoepark

    arapahoepark Puritan Board Graduate

    Ben Witherington
  5. One Little Nail

    One Little Nail Puritan Board Sophomore

    You can try Adam Clarke, Spurgeon referred to him as the prophet of the Methodists.
  6. Marcus417

    Marcus417 Puritan Board Freshman

    Classical Arminianism by Pinson and Forlines half the books seems to be discounting the reformed exegesis of Romans 9

    Classical Arminianism: F. Leroy Forlines, J. Matthew Pinson: 9780892656073: Books

    Here is Forlines commentary on Romans

    Romans (Randall House Bible Commentary): F. Leroy Forlines, Robert E. Picirilli: 9780892659494: Books

    Both books try to lay out a non-pelagian Arminianism but the theology never works out because in practice the churches always become straight up Pelagian. The Freewill Baptists are about as Pelagian as a church can be.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page