I’m not talking about the text. I’m talking about the cum hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy. You’re changing the subject. I actually lean toward the “ecclesiastical text.” But that’s not what I’m addressing.I disagree. The Christian church in the West was united with one ecclesiastical text, one translation and now there are divisions within over translations. It's difficult to claim the word of God is "kept pure in all ages" and able to settle disputes, when the eclectic text is always changing.