Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally posted by Peters
Please describe"¦
What biblical faith is
What biblical faith looks like
What biblical faith produces
Thanks in advance.
Faith is not a work
Each of these nouns has a modifier in the genitive. It matters little whether this is called "œadjectival" or "œdescriptive" or "œsubjective" genitive or genitive "œof source." All four terms have been used, but basically the idea is the same (though with a slight variation in emphasis). The idea is that the work is definitely faith-work, that is, it is work which springs from, is accomplished by, and reveals faith. Were it not for the presence of living faith, this work would not be in evidence. And so with the other modifiers: the exertion is prompted by (and reveals) love; and the endurance is inspired by (and gives evidence of) hope.
Originally posted by Scott Bushey
A component of the ordo salutis: The ordo salutis is 1) election, 2) predestination, 3) gospel call 4) inward call 5) regeneration, 6) conversion (faith & repentance), 7) justification,
8) sanctification, and 9) glorification. (Rom 8:29-30)
[Edited on 11-22-2005 by Scott Bushey]
Originally posted by JWJ
Originally posted by Scott Bushey
A component of the ordo salutis: The ordo salutis is 1) election, 2) predestination, 3) gospel call 4) inward call 5) regeneration, 6) conversion (faith & repentance), 7) justification,
8) sanctification, and 9) glorification. (Rom 8:29-30)
[Edited on 11-22-2005 by Scott Bushey]
Scott,
Should not the order be: election, predestination, regeneration (inward call), gospel call, conversion, justification, sanctification, and glorification?
Jim
Originally posted by VanVos
Faith is an ascent to a proposition Rom 10:9-10. Faith is not a work, it is the empty hand. Rom 3:28.
But..... LBCF says that saving faith is never alone Chapter XI:2. Faith thus receiving and resting on Christ and his righteousness, is the alone instrument of justification; yet it is not alone in the person justified, but is ever accompanied with all other saving graces, and is no dead faith, but worketh by love.
( Romans 3:28; Galatians 5:6; James 2:17, 22, 26 )
Have you read What Is Faith? John W. Robbins
http://www.trinityfoundation.org/journal.php?id=53
You might find it helpful.
VanVos
Eph 2:8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:
The question is what is the it referring to? Grace or faith?
I asked the following question from a Greek and Hebrew professor:
"In this verse, to what does the word "that" refer to? Adam Clarke, Wesley & company say that it is neuter plural and "Faith" is feminine hence it cannot refer to faith, (Such an admission would destroy their theological system.) However "Grace" is also feminine as is "Salvation".''
His reply was:
"Here you ask a wonderful theological/exegetical question to which I can only give an opinion, and not a definitive answer. The problem is that there is NO precise referent. Grace is feminine. Faith is feminine. And even Salvation (as a noun) is feminine. Yet it must be one of these three at least, and maybe more than one, or all three in conjunction. Since all three come from God and not from man, the latter might seem the more likely. However, it is a tautology to say salvation and grace are "nor of yourselves," and in that case it certainly looks more like the passage is really pointing out that man cannot even take credit for his own act of faith, but that faith was itself created by God and implanted in us that we might believe (i.e. the normal Calvinistic position). In which regard the whole theological issue of "regeneration preceding faith" comes into play. So, that is basically my opinion, though others obviously disagree strenuously, but from an exegetical standpoint, the other positions have to explain away the matter of the tautology.''
Whether you accept the reply or not, it is sufficient to show that the Greek is not as definitive in this verse as some scholars would have you believe. Editor
Originally posted by Scott Bushey
Originally posted by JWJ
Originally posted by Scott Bushey
A component of the ordo salutis: The ordo salutis is 1) election, 2) predestination, 3) gospel call 4) inward call 5) regeneration, 6) conversion (faith & repentance), 7) justification,
8) sanctification, and 9) glorification. (Rom 8:29-30)
[Edited on 11-22-2005 by Scott Bushey]
Scott,
Should not the order be: election, predestination, regeneration (inward call), gospel call, conversion, justification, sanctification, and glorification?
Jim
Jim,
Men cannot be regenerated without Gods word firstly applied. The refomed view is that God goes to the sinner by His word and regenerates. The regeneration makes the word effectual unto conversion.
Here's a paper by Berkhof:
http://www.ccel.org/pipeline/1-html/5-berkhof-summery/Berkhof 19.htm
Originally posted by Scott Bushey
Jim,
Cigar buddy;Can a man or infant be regenerated outside of the word of God? Example: John the Baptist. He was, by the word of God regenerated in the womb. He was later converted under the ministry of Gods servants.
Van Mastricht writes:
Regeneration, narrowly defined, should not be understood as creating a habit or exercising a new spiritual power.
Van Mastrichts ordo: regeneration, conversion, union, justification, adoption, sanctification, and glorification.
Where is the call; inward our outward? Van Mastricht was not excluding those components; everyone knows that the salvation of Gods people must come from above via the word and via His ministers. Van Mastricht did not mention them in his book based upon the idea that they are theologically assumed.
Originally posted by JWJ
Originally posted by Scott Bushey
Jim,
Cigar buddy;Can a man or infant be regenerated outside of the word of God? Example: John the Baptist. He was, by the word of God regenerated in the womb. He was later converted under the ministry of Gods servants.
Van Mastricht writes:
Regeneration, narrowly defined, should not be understood as creating a habit or exercising a new spiritual power.
Van Mastrichts ordo: regeneration, conversion, union, justification, adoption, sanctification, and glorification.
Where is the call; inward our outward? Van Mastricht was not excluding those components; everyone knows that the salvation of Gods people must come from above via the word and via His ministers. Van Mastricht did not mention them in his book based upon the idea that they are theologically assumed.
Scott,
I think we are misunderstanidng one another. What do you mean by "outside of the word of God"? What do you mean by the word of God? Do you mean the outward call or inward call? If you mean the inward call then yes I agree. All I am trying to say is that before one can hear, the physical word, he must already be alive (regenerated).
Originally posted by maxdetail
Faith is a work but it is the work of the Spirit and not of our own.
Originally posted by Scott Bushey
[
I think we are essentially on the same page; The HS brings the inward call, i.e. the word, and a person is regenerated. The person then hears the outward word by Gods messengers and is converted.
Yes?
[Edited on 11-23-2005 by Scott Bushey]
Originally posted by Scott Bushey
Jim,
For the record, Gods spirit, by His word, regenerates; this is the inward call. The outward call of the gospel, converts.
Here is Matts ordo: He doesn't even mention regeneration. Regeneration/conversion are more a process of components.
1) Decrees of God 2) Predestination, 3) Election 4) Outward call 5) Effectual call 6) Saving Faith 7) Repentance), 8) Justification,
8) Adoption, 9) Sanctification. 10) Death 11) Glorification
Originally posted by JWJ
I do have one more question. When you said "Example: John the Baptist. He was, by the word of God regenerated in the womb. He was later converted under the ministry of Gods servants." I assume you are saying that this was not the result of the outward call or preaching by God's servants, but rather the Spirit's inward sowing of the Word?
Jim