G'day.
Over here in Australia we have a pretty sharp young theologian by the name of Michael Bird. He has written a number of books on Paul and Pauline studies, etc.
Here is his blog, which is normally quite good. However I discovered this post this morning which I found very disturbing. What do you think about this argument?
Euangelion: Synerism?
Over here in Australia we have a pretty sharp young theologian by the name of Michael Bird. He has written a number of books on Paul and Pauline studies, etc.
Here is his blog, which is normally quite good. However I discovered this post this morning which I found very disturbing. What do you think about this argument?
Euangelion: Synerism?