GenRev1611
Puritan Board Freshman
I was wondering if someone can answer this question. In a recent essay that I wrote I stated that causality and uniformity which gives the existing preconditions for empirical observation can only have it's origin in the Triune God. I've read a number of Van Til's works, and have heard many of Bahnsen's lectures. Bahnsen appeals to induction to state his case for Christian theism. However, when one looks closely at the matter, one can seem to really only come up at least with monotheism. What I mean is that he makes the case that induction is a strong argument against atheism but never in his lectures or debates does he make the case that induction is a strong argument for Christian theism.
Having said that, I have come up with this understanding. Nature's uniformity and regularity can only exist upon the foundation of the Trinity. The basis for my argument is that communication presupposes that words have meaning that will never change. And since the Triune God doesn't change his mind, then there must be absolute unity of thought within the Godhead since the Three Persons are in absolute agreement. Let me state also that words can only have uniform meaning because a word's meaning reflects the nature of the Triune God's simultaneous imminence and transcendence which makes meaning universal rather than contingent. If unitarianism is true, then there could be no basis for nature's diversity essential to uniformity precisely because prior to the existence of any other thing or being, the god of unitarian thought could not have acted upon the basis of any other prior pre-existing causes. So the uniformity that would exist within the god of unitarianism could not bring diversity and therefore never make sense of experience. Also this would make diversity that is essential to uniformity a mere contingency. Hence, you have monism.
And the gods of polytheism could not be the true deities precisely because these deities have no absolute unity within their diversity. Polytheists for the most part don't believe that ideals exist within the deities themselves anyhow. Having said that, inductive inference must have something that unifies it's order, so that diverse experiences can be unified. Otherwise you have atomism.
So here's my case, please follow, if there was eternal communication within the Godhead, that communication had inherent within it's nature absolute uniformity. So since there was, is, and always will be absolute uniformity within the relationship of the Godhead; then this uniformity must be based upon the Three Persons being in total agreement in diverse communication. To put it simply, when the Persons within the Godhead communicate with one another, there is a perfect causal relationship within their communication. And if God's creation reflects His eternal nature, then the uniformity, diversity, and causality within the imminent creation must be a reflectance of his unifying nature within the diverse persons of the Godhead.
Also this touches upon the Doctrine of Divine Simplicity. If the causality, diversity, and uniformity that exists within the imminent creation reflect the nature of God, then one cannot divorce them from their own foundation. Hence, transcendental abstractions are necessary rather than contingent because they are founded upon the Triune God. This also means that causality and uniformity are necessary rather than contingent for the very same reason.
If unitarianism and polytheism is true, then there could be no basis for diversity within unitarianism and no basis for unity essential to uniformity within polytheism. Hence there could be no or causality and if there were causality, it would be merely contingent and temporal. If this were the case, then there could be no basis for trusting science because there could be no basis for knowing if causation will suddenly cease. If anyone has heard this somewhere in some other writings, please let me know.
I just think that essential to have a proper understanding of the one and the many to properly grasp both uniformity, and causality.
Having said that, I have come up with this understanding. Nature's uniformity and regularity can only exist upon the foundation of the Trinity. The basis for my argument is that communication presupposes that words have meaning that will never change. And since the Triune God doesn't change his mind, then there must be absolute unity of thought within the Godhead since the Three Persons are in absolute agreement. Let me state also that words can only have uniform meaning because a word's meaning reflects the nature of the Triune God's simultaneous imminence and transcendence which makes meaning universal rather than contingent. If unitarianism is true, then there could be no basis for nature's diversity essential to uniformity precisely because prior to the existence of any other thing or being, the god of unitarian thought could not have acted upon the basis of any other prior pre-existing causes. So the uniformity that would exist within the god of unitarianism could not bring diversity and therefore never make sense of experience. Also this would make diversity that is essential to uniformity a mere contingency. Hence, you have monism.
And the gods of polytheism could not be the true deities precisely because these deities have no absolute unity within their diversity. Polytheists for the most part don't believe that ideals exist within the deities themselves anyhow. Having said that, inductive inference must have something that unifies it's order, so that diverse experiences can be unified. Otherwise you have atomism.
So here's my case, please follow, if there was eternal communication within the Godhead, that communication had inherent within it's nature absolute uniformity. So since there was, is, and always will be absolute uniformity within the relationship of the Godhead; then this uniformity must be based upon the Three Persons being in total agreement in diverse communication. To put it simply, when the Persons within the Godhead communicate with one another, there is a perfect causal relationship within their communication. And if God's creation reflects His eternal nature, then the uniformity, diversity, and causality within the imminent creation must be a reflectance of his unifying nature within the diverse persons of the Godhead.
Also this touches upon the Doctrine of Divine Simplicity. If the causality, diversity, and uniformity that exists within the imminent creation reflect the nature of God, then one cannot divorce them from their own foundation. Hence, transcendental abstractions are necessary rather than contingent because they are founded upon the Triune God. This also means that causality and uniformity are necessary rather than contingent for the very same reason.
If unitarianism and polytheism is true, then there could be no basis for diversity within unitarianism and no basis for unity essential to uniformity within polytheism. Hence there could be no or causality and if there were causality, it would be merely contingent and temporal. If this were the case, then there could be no basis for trusting science because there could be no basis for knowing if causation will suddenly cease. If anyone has heard this somewhere in some other writings, please let me know.
I just think that essential to have a proper understanding of the one and the many to properly grasp both uniformity, and causality.