Fine. I am happy for some "slack". However in the same post in the next breath so to speak you say I used the term. I just would appreciate a fair reading is all.
I agreed previously when I stated, "I was showing the attitude that came across by the addition of the hyper to cause a negative connotation to those that might read or agree with certain ppl on certain things."
I've done some reading and some things have come to my attention that help me to understand why there might be antagonism towards the whole UC&H and Phillips ordeal. Please understand that the actions of some is not neccessarily the intent of the originator or others that are encouraged by the originator's writings. Thus I'm starting to understand the use of "hyper-Phillipism" just as there are "hyper-Calvinists". No I'm not caught up in hyper-Phillipism (what I know as Shepardism).