Archlute
Puritan Board Senior
Anyone can write complex and technically thick essays, but it doesn't mean that they are exegetically factual or truthful. Why do you think some of Kline's works are so convoluted? (cheap shot noted, although the point still stands)
The point doesn't stand. Long and complicated and be just as correct as short and simple. Your knock at Kline is simply an unsupported assertion. The definition of a cheap shot.
You sound as though someone cannot honestly work through the text of Genesis and arrive at anything other than what you believe. That is simply arrogant.
Jon,
You're just finding things to fight against. I've worked through the Hebrew of the entire first 11 chapters of Genesis in detail. I have also read Kline in detail, and therefore find it no unsupported assertion. It may have been unkind, but not unsupported. Are you a supporter of Lee and Misty Irons per chance? That is an honest question.
Btw, are you going to challenge my point about your attempt to separate ethics from theology? If not, then you should retract your assertion that it is wrong to make the statement that one cannot hold aberrant views of homosexual unions and still be considered a theologically orthodox and conservative Reformed Christian.
Last edited: