VirginiaHuguenot
Puritanboard Librarian
Anybody want to talk about college football this year?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally posted by Puritanhead
Blue 32... Set... Hut... Hike
My father is at the Georgia Tech v. Notre Dame game.
All that matters is that one wins, not the point spread. Besides, Ohio State only beat Northern Illini, which is not exactly a Big Ten stalwart... 35-12... Michigan and Notre Dame have two of the most competitive schedules in the country.Originally posted by houseparent
BUT...
Like PSU and OSU (Ohio not Oklahoma) both Michigan and ND should have won by larger scores and displayed more dominance in my opinion.
Originally posted by Puritanhead
All that matters is that one wins, not the point spread. Besides, Ohio State only beat Northern Illini, which is not exactly a Big Ten stalwart... 35-12... Michigan and Notre Dame have two of the most competitive schedules in the country.Originally posted by houseparent
BUT...
Like PSU and OSU (Ohio not Oklahoma) both Michigan and ND should have won by larger scores and displayed more dominance in my opinion.
Texas is playing Ohio State next week. I hope OSU gets whipped. I like to see a Big Ten team knocked down a notch every now and then.
The problem with making point spread too much of a barometer for assessing team ranking / performance is that PAC-10 powerhouses like Southern Cal and Big 12 powerhouses like Texas and Nebraska can run up the score all day against their competitors. The Big 12, Pac-10, and ACC are not always so competitive. Perhaps it should be a factor for the National Championship, but point spread shouldn't be weighed so heavily in the regular season. In the past, when some ostensible powerhouse team played in an uncompetive wimp conference while running up the score all season long, their weaknesses were exposed when they played outside the conference in a bowl game at end-of-season against a Big Ten team, or some titan.Originally posted by houseparent
Sadly, the point spread DOES matter. More than once the poinst spread has cost PSU a National Championship.
I'm from Virginia; though I lived in Notre Dame as a kid when my dad went there in the 1980s.Originally posted by BaptistCanuk
Ryan, are you from Indiana? My fiancee lives about a half hour from South Bend.
I hope SC does good this year, and believe they will. I always like to see the pride of the Cornhuskers cut down a notch too. I predict SC takes it home by a touchdown and a field goal this coming weekend.Originally posted by WrittenFromUtopia
USC vs. Nebraska should be a good game.
Originally posted by Puritanhead
The problem with making point spread too much of a barometer for assessing team ranking / performance is that PAC-10 powerhouses like Southern Cal and Big 12 powerhouses like Texas and Nebraska can run up the score all day against their competitors. The Big 12, Pac-10, and ACC are not always so competitive. Perhaps it should be a factor for the National Championship, but point spread shouldn't be weighed so heavily in the regular season. In the past, when some ostensible powerhouse team played in an uncompetive wimp conference while running up the score all season long, their weaknesses were exposed when they played outside the conference in a bowl game at end-of-season against a Big Ten team, or some titan.Originally posted by houseparent
Sadly, the point spread DOES matter. More than once the poinst spread has cost PSU a National Championship.
All that could be avoided if collegiate football simply had a playoff system, and integrated the Bowl Games into them. The NCAA politics and money are stacked against this needed reform sadly.
[Edited on 9-3-2006 by Puritanhead]
Originally posted by BaptistCanuk
I'm wondering if I would be called "rediculous" for cheering for Notre Dame.