Comment by Packer on covenant theology

Status
Not open for further replies.

Me Died Blue

Puritan Board Post-Graduate
In section V on Packer's introduction to Witsius' [i:3fc253a5a4]Economy of the Covenants[/i:3fc253a5a4], he speaks of "a biblical-theological, redemptive-historical perspective for presenting covenant theology (three periods -- the covenant of works, made with Adam; the covenant of grace, made with and through Moses; the new covenant, made through Christ)." Is it just me, or is this unbiblically splitting the covenant of grace (and wrongly asserting that it was made with Moses)? Am I misunderstanding Packer? I hope so.
 

fredtgreco

Vanilla Westminsterian
Staff member
I think he is simply following the structure of WCF 7, in which the two main administrations of the covenant of grace are set forth. I would recommend Rowland Ward's [i:794ef16052]God and Adam[/i:794ef16052].
 

Scott

Puritan Board Graduate
I did not check the full context of the quote, but the covenant of grace is eternal, and is among the members of the Trinity.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top