arapahoepark
Puritan Board Professor
I was reading through the introduction to get a sense of why Romans 9-11 was there but, from his language he seemed to back up Barth's 
view of election and particularly citing 'not all who are israel are of israel.' Can anyone else attest to this?
view of election and particularly citing 'not all who are israel are of israel.' Can anyone else attest to this?
