ChristopherPaul
Puritan Board Senior
In response to the slight tangent at this thread, in the scheme of things, I question the practicality of some of the arguments that occur here.
Regarding the "minor" issues, I have no choice but to submit to the church I am in fellowship with. I love my church and thank God for the brethren in my area. So many here (at the PB) argue for a particular order of worship, for singing Psalms exclusively and not hymns, using or not using instruments, to appoint or to not appoint women deacons, etc, etc, etc.
If I allowed my conscience to be convicted over everything that is argued for around here, I would be churchless. I mean, you guys create churches that do not exist. If there is one way in the matter of all the "minor" issues, then we are all doomed to be in fellowship of unorthodox churches in some aspect. There are zero RPCGA or RPCNA churches in central New Jersey. There is one OPC, and two PCA, and a ton of PC-USA. So what is one to do knowing that they are a layman living in a state with no orthodox churches?
Why don't all these "more orthodox churches" actually appoint elders in every city as Paul commissioned Titus? Why not have many, say RPCNA, churches - one in each town, which may result in smaller congregations per each (imagine actually sitting at the Lord's table with the entire church!), but more accessible to all?
Shall I argue that all churches are to only have one service on a Lord's day morning instead of two or more to accommodate the overwhelming attendance? What good will that do being that many members here faithfully attend confessional Presbyterian churches that have a first and second or more service? What good will it do to bind my conscience to sing only inspired Psalms in worship when all the confessional churches around me incorporate hymns and or gospel songs/praise choruses? Are you convicting me so that I will start a revolt within my own church? Have my pastors and elders considered such arguments? Yes, do they disagree with some of that arguments on these issues? Yes. Do I leave fellowship over it? No. Do I faithfully submit to their guidance and discipline, supporting them with my time, treasures and talents? Yes - gladly.
The Puritan board is a great resource for edification and learning, but my church is who I submit to, not pastors, elders, and laypersons from all across the world who happen to be internet savvy.
Practically speaking, either more room needs to be given on some of these issues, or these churches who believe they have it right need to be much more missional in appointing elders in every city to start churches that are accessible to the people all over the world.
Not all here are teachers. Not all here are ruling elders, not all are apologists, seminary students, etc.
Personally I do not have a defense for or against women being in the deaconate or exclusive psalmody, but I have a stance and it is that which my church and her officers holds because I trust her. What else can I do? I will support the women deacons at my church and I will gladly sing the hymns and praise choruses in one accord with the brethren. Is this wrong? Should I instead grumble and start factions or remain sitting with my arms crossed while they participate in such unorthodox practices?
In grace,
Regarding the "minor" issues, I have no choice but to submit to the church I am in fellowship with. I love my church and thank God for the brethren in my area. So many here (at the PB) argue for a particular order of worship, for singing Psalms exclusively and not hymns, using or not using instruments, to appoint or to not appoint women deacons, etc, etc, etc.
If I allowed my conscience to be convicted over everything that is argued for around here, I would be churchless. I mean, you guys create churches that do not exist. If there is one way in the matter of all the "minor" issues, then we are all doomed to be in fellowship of unorthodox churches in some aspect. There are zero RPCGA or RPCNA churches in central New Jersey. There is one OPC, and two PCA, and a ton of PC-USA. So what is one to do knowing that they are a layman living in a state with no orthodox churches?
Why don't all these "more orthodox churches" actually appoint elders in every city as Paul commissioned Titus? Why not have many, say RPCNA, churches - one in each town, which may result in smaller congregations per each (imagine actually sitting at the Lord's table with the entire church!), but more accessible to all?
Shall I argue that all churches are to only have one service on a Lord's day morning instead of two or more to accommodate the overwhelming attendance? What good will that do being that many members here faithfully attend confessional Presbyterian churches that have a first and second or more service? What good will it do to bind my conscience to sing only inspired Psalms in worship when all the confessional churches around me incorporate hymns and or gospel songs/praise choruses? Are you convicting me so that I will start a revolt within my own church? Have my pastors and elders considered such arguments? Yes, do they disagree with some of that arguments on these issues? Yes. Do I leave fellowship over it? No. Do I faithfully submit to their guidance and discipline, supporting them with my time, treasures and talents? Yes - gladly.
The Puritan board is a great resource for edification and learning, but my church is who I submit to, not pastors, elders, and laypersons from all across the world who happen to be internet savvy.
Practically speaking, either more room needs to be given on some of these issues, or these churches who believe they have it right need to be much more missional in appointing elders in every city to start churches that are accessible to the people all over the world.
Not all here are teachers. Not all here are ruling elders, not all are apologists, seminary students, etc.
Personally I do not have a defense for or against women being in the deaconate or exclusive psalmody, but I have a stance and it is that which my church and her officers holds because I trust her. What else can I do? I will support the women deacons at my church and I will gladly sing the hymns and praise choruses in one accord with the brethren. Is this wrong? Should I instead grumble and start factions or remain sitting with my arms crossed while they participate in such unorthodox practices?
In grace,