D.A Carson Exegetical Falacies book

Status
Not open for further replies.

JesusIsLord

Puritan Board Freshman
Good day guys. Im reading through D. A Carson's Exegetical Falacies and I am wondering if this is a reliable book? Havent had much experience with D.A Carson.
 
It is generally pretty good and provides excellent examples of things to avoid and be careful of as we exegete the text. My only critique would be that he sometimes takes it a bit too far. For example, he argues that John's alternation of Greek words for love in John 21 is not significant in light of the fact that these words are often used interchangeably in Greek. This is certainly true, however I would agree with Hendriksen and others who argue that it can be significant depending on context, and that John 21 is just such an instance.
 
Good day guys. Im reading through D. A Carson's Exegetical Falacies and I am wondering if this is a reliable book? Havent had much experience with D.A Carson.

It's fun. It's almost as good as his NT Commentary Survey, which reads like a joke book. It taught me how to spot the word = concept fallacy.
 
It's a useful book, though not all of his examples carry equal conviction. Like any book of prescriptions, it can be applied mechanically and do harm as well as good..
 
What are some examples of exegetical falacies?

Here are some examples:

Dynamite comes from the Greek word "dunamis" so the English word "dynamite" helps you to understand what "dunamis" means.

A word always derives its meaning from the components of which it is made.

A word means only thing everywhere and anywhere.
 
Last edited:
Thank you, Toast.

So this isn't a common mistake a layman in his English devos needs to beware of.
 
Thank you, Toast.

So this isn't a common mistake a layman in his English devos needs to beware of.

We laymen do well if we know the common exegetical fallacies, if only to help us discern whether a given teaching, book point or opinion is true or not.
 
Read it more than three decades ago (first edition) and thought it one of the most important books I ever read on the correct interpretation of the Bible. Haven't changed my mind since.
 
Thank you, Toast.

So this isn't a common mistake a layman in his English devos needs to beware of.

In my experience, many of the fallacies Carson addresses tend to pop up not only in sermons but also in Sunday school classes or home Bible studies, where well-meaning believers who've heard/read a certain comment or are consulting the Greek in their interlinear Bible make interpretation assumptions they shouldn't. So for personal study reading your English Bible, this book may not be so necessary. But if you ever study alongside others, I think it would be helpful. (Just be gentle when pointing out the fallacies they use!)
 
Thank you, Toast.

So this isn't a common mistake a layman in his English devos needs to beware of.

The book also covers logical, presuppositional, and historical fallacies so this can be helpful when reading the English Bible.
 
It's a great book. I don't think there's any other book out there quite like it. Even if you don't know Greek, it can be very useful and instructive. And it can be pretty hilarious at times.
 
Great book. I think it is very useful to demonstrate (in some sense) how lazy and sloppy many are with how they handle words. I know some people who are absolutely obsessed with word studies and finding the root meaning of words. The book helps even a layman understand that there is not a single method but overlapping disciplines at play and it's good to see how many dumb ideas are just passed on without thiniking about them. People like shortcuts to thinking and Carson challenges you to think more deeply about exegesis with this work.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top