I read the KJV Debate quite a few years ago. I guess the thing that disturbed me was that he didn't deal with a few texts of scripture that I had made pet verses. We all have pet verses.
One of my verses was 1Timothy 3:16 where the word Theos is turned into He.
His critique also didn't satisfy my understanding of manuscript evidence. The older manuscripts are the best because they are closer in age argument has wholes. If I remember he truly didn't cover the subject addressing the older reference quotes that where more along the lines of the Byzantine line.
At least Dr. White acknowledged the 1 Timothy 3:16 passage and acknowledged the reading probably should read God was manifest in the flesh.
Why did the other thread get locked down?
[Edited on 1-7-2005 by puritancovenanter]
One of my verses was 1Timothy 3:16 where the word Theos is turned into He.
His critique also didn't satisfy my understanding of manuscript evidence. The older manuscripts are the best because they are closer in age argument has wholes. If I remember he truly didn't cover the subject addressing the older reference quotes that where more along the lines of the Byzantine line.
At least Dr. White acknowledged the 1 Timothy 3:16 passage and acknowledged the reading probably should read God was manifest in the flesh.
Why did the other thread get locked down?
[Edited on 1-7-2005 by puritancovenanter]