Eoghan
Puritan Board Senior
It is unclear to me why Arioch should take the credit for finding Daniel when verse 16 says (or does it merely suggest?) that Daniel had already had an audience with the king and been given an extension of 24 hours (or however long he was given).
Was the king in such a state that he could not remember Daniel? The footnote in the ESB says Daniel requested from Aurioch an appointment with the king to reveal the answer.
A. Daniel went in and spoke to the king in person. (so why is he introduced as a stranger in v 25?)
B. Daniel asked Auroch to petition the king on his behalf for a future appointment (why not say "Here's Daniel, as arranged")
C. something I have not thought of (please, please specify)
Was the king in such a state that he could not remember Daniel? The footnote in the ESB says Daniel requested from Aurioch an appointment with the king to reveal the answer.
A. Daniel went in and spoke to the king in person. (so why is he introduced as a stranger in v 25?)
B. Daniel asked Auroch to petition the king on his behalf for a future appointment (why not say "Here's Daniel, as arranged")
C. something I have not thought of (please, please specify)