thistle93
Puritan Board Freshman
Hi! I find it ironic that many of those who scorn amillennialists for not being literal about the 1,000 year millennium in Revelation 20 are the same ones who stretch the 69 & 70th week in Daniel 9 to over 2,000+ years. That does not seem very literal to me. I see nowhere in the text this gap. I am much more inclined to take the 70 weeks of Daniel literal then the 1,000 millennium in Revelation, because of the difference in genre. Any thoughts? Thank you!
For His Glory-
Matthew
For His Glory-
Matthew