Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Honestly, this is something I struggle with. Baggage from a heathen up-bringing most likely.
Is the book worth it?
So, I just finished chapter 5 ("The Framework Hypothesis: An Interpretation of Genesis 1:1-2:3" by Mark Ross).
No offense to Dr. Ross (who's other material I have enjoyed), but how can anyone hold to such a strange doctrine as the Framework Hypothesis? It just doesn't make sense!
Anyway, I'm still enjoying the book. I'm about to start chapter 6, which should be interesting since one of my professors at Biola was lauding Collins' view of Gen. 1 a couple of semesters back.
-----Added 7/27/2009 at 06:50:09 EST-----
Honestly, this is something I struggle with. Baggage from a heathen up-bringing most likely.
Is the book worth it?
Willie, I think so! I mean, it's only a dollar (plus S&H, so about 7 bucks total). I've read the first 5 chapters and found them to be very interesting.
Randy,
What is the version of Hall's paper in the book? I did a bit of research work for him. Several versions of David's paper are online such as here.
Chris,
It looks more like the revised one that the first one links to. But it is still a little different I think. It is outstanding and quite forceful in requiring those who wish to make the Divines say something that they didn't, fess up to wishful thinking or to produce better material that proves the Divines held to a long age day interpretation. Because of the challenges to his first paper, David Hall went back to search out the sources and they still come up short according to his revision which is evidently only an improvement upon his first paper.
I really appreciated seeing how Morton Smith put this in a historical perspective (per the denominations) in the first chapter of the book. I am still plowing my way through it slowly.
You want to know something. I am reading this book because of my son Joshua Caleb. He has been discussing this stuff with his teacher and class at School and confounding him. Josh had a test on evolution and flunked it because he wrote truthful answers to the questions. Boy is he in trouble now. NOT.
Josh has had to learn to be respectful. The teacher Mr. Steven's did try to pull one on the students by asking why would God create all the little insects and smaller life. Josh just replied, "because he wanted to." Simple answers for complex minds. I would have said something to the effect of God's Glory is revealed... yadda... yadda... yadda...... and they are a part of the food chain. Sometimes simple is good.
So, I just finished chapter 5 ("The Framework Hypothesis: An Interpretation of Genesis 1:1-2:3" by Mark Ross).
No offense to Dr. Ross (who's other material I have enjoyed), but how can anyone hold to such a strange doctrine as the Framework Hypothesis? It just doesn't make sense!
Anyway, I'm still enjoying the book. I'm about to start chapter 6, which should be interesting since one of my professors at Biola was lauding Collins' view of Gen. 1 a couple of semesters back.
-----Added 7/27/2009 at 06:50:09 EST-----
Honestly, this is something I struggle with. Baggage from a heathen up-bringing most likely.
Is the book worth it?
Willie, I think so! I mean, it's only a dollar (plus S&H, so about 7 bucks total). I've read the first 5 chapters and found them to be very interesting.
Do you mean Hugh Ross? Dr. Mark Ross is an Erskine seminary professor who I greatly admire.
I kindly asked Chris if he could unlock this old thread, as I've just received my copy of Did God Create in 6 Days? I've read the first two chapters and am midway through the third and can't put the book down.
Who else has read it? What are your thoughts?
Did any of my fellow ARP-ers note that Morton Smith singles us out for exclusion in the third sentence of his chapter? Ouch! I would have been interested in a little Seceder history in addition to the PCUS/PCA history.
Also, does anyone know how to get a hold of a copy of Dr. Frank J. Smith's PhD dissertation "The Philosophy of Science in Late Nineteenth Century Southern Presbyterianism"? I'd love to read that, but can't find it in the CUNY catalog (which seems to be not working) and I can't find any contact information online for Dr. Smith. (I'd like to ask him a couple of things about his article in the Confessional Presbyterian "American Presbyterianism, Geology, and the Days of Creation.")
So, I just finished chapter 5 ("The Framework Hypothesis: An Interpretation of Genesis 1:1-2:3" by Mark Ross).
No offense to Dr. Ross (who's other material I have enjoyed), but how can anyone hold to such a strange doctrine as the Framework Hypothesis? It just doesn't make sense!
Anyway, I'm still enjoying the book. I'm about to start chapter 6, which should be interesting since one of my professors at Biola was lauding Collins' view of Gen. 1 a couple of semesters back.
-----Added 7/27/2009 at 06:50:09 EST-----
Willie, I think so! I mean, it's only a dollar (plus S&H, so about 7 bucks total). I've read the first 5 chapters and found them to be very interesting.
Do you mean Hugh Ross? Dr. Mark Ross is an Erskine seminary professor who I greatly admire.
No, I mean Mark Ross. He is the author of chapter 5 on the Framework Hypothesis. I like other things he has done (his elder/deacon training DVD series has been most enjoyable and edifying!), but on this issue, I strongly disagree.
No, I mean Mark Ross. He is the author of chapter 5 on the Framework Hypothesis. I like other things he has done (his elder/deacon training DVD series has been most enjoyable and edifying!), but on this issue, I strongly disagree.
Does he promote that view or is he just explaining it? I am sort of surprised because he is conservative otherwise and one of the best preachers I have ever heard. Thanks for the clarification, though. I've ordered the book, so I will be able to read it.
Do you mean Hugh Ross? Dr. Mark Ross is an Erskine seminary professor who I greatly admire.
No, I mean Mark Ross. He is the author of chapter 5 on the Framework Hypothesis. I like other things he has done (his elder/deacon training DVD series has been most enjoyable and edifying!), but on this issue, I strongly disagree.
Does he promote that view or is he just explaining it? I am sort of surprised because he is conservative otherwise and one of the best preachers I have ever heard. Thanks for the clarification, though. I've ordered the book, so I will be able to read it.
Question: Did God Create in 6 Days?
Answer: "For in six days the LORD made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them" -Ex 20:11 NASB and "for in six days the LORD made heaven and earth" -Ex 31:17 NASB
I couldn't get the link to work either. I just had to go to the main page and find the book.
Did God Create in Six Days?
The only way to fit millions of years (or any other alternate solution) into the 6 days of creation is to bring some outside idea and try to cram it INTO the bible.
He concludes with this . . .Jack B. Scott said:. . .
I have been blessed to serve this church in various capacities over the past years and have recently retired from the active ministry in the church. So why am I writing now?
I see things, once again, which are disturbing, in particular, the issue over the "days" of Genesis 1. There are those in our denomination who will tell you that to insist on understanding those days as meaning 24 hour days, such as we experience today, is to "go beyond Scripture." Don't you believe it! That is precisely what Scripture does say. Clearly, God intended that we understand it that way by repeating, at the end of each day of creation, "there was evening and there was morning" day one and on, through six days of creation. To understand it any other way would be to add to or to take from God's Word. [p. 37]
. . .
But how can we compromise Scripture? God gave it, as he gave it, and we cannot yield on that. If the Lord did not intend that we understand it as six normal days, as we experience them in everyday life, then why would he give to each day an evening and a morning? And why would he repeat this teaching, later, in the giving of the Law to Moses? [p. 38]
. . .
The president of Covenant Seminary, in defending as possible another interpretation of days than the literal 24-hour day, insists that Covenant Seminary has not changed. But I do not find that assuring at all. Did they begin with that position? Then they began wrong. [p. 39]
. . .
The president of Covenant Theological Seminary says that his concern is to be as true to the Biblical text as is humanly possible. My concern is that the Church accept the Bible as God has given it, whether it seems humanly reasonable or not! The issue is not whether our church be large and influential, by broadening its teaching to include those who question what the Bible has clearly taught, but whether we remain faithful to God's Word. Paul was viewed as having less than success by some of the Corinthian church members. His response was that his desire was not to please the multitudes but to be a sweet savor of Christ unto God. "We are not as the many, corrupting the word of God, but as of sincerity, but as of God, in the sight of God, speak we in Christ" (2 Cor. 2:14-17). We should desire every teacher of the Word in our denomination to have just that same commitment. [pp. 39-40]
. . .
Yes, this was one of my favorite parts of the book.Jack B. Scott said:Who am I? I am a watchman expected by God to give warning. I would be derelict in my duty as a teacher in the Presbyterian Church in America if I did not give warning in these days of great danger to our church. I do not wish to see this church go down the path that other Presbyterian denominations have gone down earlier in this century. God did not bring this church into existence in order that it should so soon take the path that leads away from the authority of God's Word, in its teaching.
"Has God said?" was the question initially put to our first parents, Adam and Eve. Satan, in various guises and ways has been putting that same question to every church established to do God's will. What will our answer be? [p. 40]
Just trying to get folks interested in this great book. Sorry if I ruined it for you.Hey! Don't ruin it for me!!
I'm really looking forward to reading this one.