TimV
Puritanboard Botanist
I was asked to read this article by Gary North
http://freebooks.entrewave.com/freebooks/docs/html/gnbd/Chapter21.htm
It contains this paragraph:
My comment is that I have absolutely no idea what he is talking about. Even the first sentance is bizzare, since quail are clean.
http://freebooks.entrewave.com/freebooks/docs/html/gnbd/Chapter21.htm
It contains this paragraph:
These dietary laws had little immediate relevance in the wilderness; the nation survived on manna. Only when the Israelites crossed over the Promised Land's boundary, and were circumcised, did the manna cease. At that point, the dietary laws became relevant. This is why I argue that the dietary laws were tied to the land and the Levitical laws of inheritance. The dietary laws lost all covenantal relevance once the land of Canaan ceased to be an aspect of the Abrahamic promise: in A.D. 70.
My comment is that I have absolutely no idea what he is talking about. Even the first sentance is bizzare, since quail are clean.