Frosty
Puritan Board Sophomore
Reflecting on the current events in Syria as well as the events of 9/11 got me thinking.
Is it accurate to say that jihadist Muslim extremists are the "by the book", literal interpretation, Muslims? I know the Koran has a number of passages that would definitely be jihadist in nature.
And do therefore the other sects hold to more liberal interpretations of the Koran? These being non-radical jihadist Muslims.
I once read a good book by a Presbyterian missionary regarding Christian witnessing to Muslims, but it didn't really get into the differences among different sects. It was more basic in its approach.
Any help would be appreciated for this curious mind.
Is it accurate to say that jihadist Muslim extremists are the "by the book", literal interpretation, Muslims? I know the Koran has a number of passages that would definitely be jihadist in nature.
And do therefore the other sects hold to more liberal interpretations of the Koran? These being non-radical jihadist Muslims.
I once read a good book by a Presbyterian missionary regarding Christian witnessing to Muslims, but it didn't really get into the differences among different sects. It was more basic in its approach.
Any help would be appreciated for this curious mind.