Dinosaur Soft Tissue

[ZackF]

I've been looking closer at the Dinosaur soft-tissue subject unfolding the past few years. I remember an interview creationist microscopist Mark Armitage gave where he said there were likely cabinets and drawers full of dinosaur bones all over the world that have soft tissue in them. Scientists though don't want to crack open their whole bone specimens. A find this recent paper of his about nerves, even if somewhat over my head, fascinating. Anyone else here with an interest in this soft tissue subject?

 

[Jeri Tanner]

I've been looking closer at the Dinosaur soft-tissue subject unfolding the past few years. I remember an interview creationist microscopist Mark Armitage gave where he said there were likely cabinets and drawers full of dinosaur bones all over the world that have soft tissue in them. Scientists though don't want to crack open their whole bone specimens. A find this recent paper of his about nerves, even if somewhat over my head, fascinating. Anyone else here with an interest in this soft tissue subject?

I’d love to hear more about it but don’t know anything to share.

 

[JennyGeddes]

I’d love to hear more about it but don’t know anything to share.

I was just thinking this exact same thing, Ms. Jeri!

 

[Andrew35]

My preference

 

[Edward]

Dinosaur soft-tissue

Tastes like Chicken. Josh @jw might even have a good recipe that he could adapt.

 

[Charles Johnson]

I grew up in a different age when creationism was a dogmatic truth among baptist-type evangelicals, and our evangelical megachurch hosted creationist speakers regularly. I remember this coming up. Only 16 years ago or so.

 

[ZackF]

Tastes like Chicken. Josh @jw might even have a good recipe that he could adapt.

Soviet chicken?

 

[Edward]

Soviet chicken?

Well some scientists say they are reptiles, so we know that alligator and rattlesnake taste like chicken. And some say they are avian, thus are just big chickens.

 

[lynnie]

That was an interesting article. Over my head too.

The nucleated red blood cells they have found is fascinating too, although being a young earth, literal Noah's flood believer, it isn't a surprise. 75 million years for soft tissue, I don't think so. Even a few thousand years seems amazing. It seems like this subject is being buried by the mainstream because of the implications.

Scientists Find Soft Tissue in 75‑Million‑Year‑Old Dinosaur Bones | HISTORY

In a pile of unpromising dinosaur fossils dug up in Canada a century ago, British scientists find soft tissue materials preserved for some 75 million years.

www.history.com