Dr. Bob Gonzales
Puritan Board Junior
Brothers,
I have a friend who is teaching through the Confession in his Sunday School class, and he has asked me a question pertaining to the Confession's language in chapter 7, paragraph's 2 and 3, which appear to link covenant headship to both Adam and Eve. I suspect that this topic has already been discussed on the PB, but I thought I raise it on behalf of my friend since I myself do not know the intent behind the confession's language. I've pasted my friend's inquiry below. Can anyone offer some commentary?
I have a friend who is teaching through the Confession in his Sunday School class, and he has asked me a question pertaining to the Confession's language in chapter 7, paragraph's 2 and 3, which appear to link covenant headship to both Adam and Eve. I suspect that this topic has already been discussed on the PB, but I thought I raise it on behalf of my friend since I myself do not know the intent behind the confession's language. I've pasted my friend's inquiry below. Can anyone offer some commentary?
I'm trying to understand the language of the confession as it relates to a Reformed view of the fall. My understanding is that Adam as an individual was chosen as the head of the race and our representative in the test in the garden (Rom. 5:12-19, 1 Cor. 15:45). But the confession seems to assign headship to both Adam and Eve:
VII.2. Our first parents, by this sin, fell from their original righteousness and communion with God, and we in them...
VII.3. They being the root, and by God's appointment, standing in the room and stead of all mankind, the guilt of the sin was imputed, and corrupted nature conveyed, to all their posterity descending from them by ordinary generation, being now conceived in sin...
Is the confession making the claim that both Adam and Eve were in some sense representing us? Is this at odds with standard Reformed thought on the matter? (I know that hardly seems possible given that this is essentially the same language as the WCF and the Savoy.) Do some people take "Adam" to mean "man as male and female" and therefore see headship in Adam & Eve as a couple rather than in Adam as an individual?
I've never seen much discussion in systematic theologies concerning the temporal priority of Eve's sin and its relationship to headship.
Cordially,I've never seen much discussion in systematic theologies concerning the temporal priority of Eve's sin and its relationship to headship.