christianyouth
Puritan Board Senior
From a lot of Biblical studies guys, I've been hearing that Job must have been written by two authors. They say that the poetic dialogs which makes up the bulk of the book are written in an ancient form of Hebrew, while the Introduction and the conclusion part of the book is a later form of Hebrew that has Persian loan words.
The argument posed by some liberal scholars, most notably Erhman, is that the book of Job presents to us with two different answers to the question of why people suffer. The poetic dialogs give us the answer that we don't know why good people suffer, they just do, and God's ways are inscrutable. While the Intro + epilogue give a more classical answer to the question of suffering; Righteous people can suffer for a TIME, but in the end they will eventually be vindicated and blessed even more for their faithfulness.
What do you all think of this? Is there any evidence for the dual authorship of Job? Is there any evidence that the book of Job answers the problem of suffering in two different ways?
Thanks all.
-In Christ,
Andy.
The argument posed by some liberal scholars, most notably Erhman, is that the book of Job presents to us with two different answers to the question of why people suffer. The poetic dialogs give us the answer that we don't know why good people suffer, they just do, and God's ways are inscrutable. While the Intro + epilogue give a more classical answer to the question of suffering; Righteous people can suffer for a TIME, but in the end they will eventually be vindicated and blessed even more for their faithfulness.
What do you all think of this? Is there any evidence for the dual authorship of Job? Is there any evidence that the book of Job answers the problem of suffering in two different ways?
Thanks all.
-In Christ,
Andy.