Steve Curtis
Puritan Board Senior
Are any of my PB brethren familiar with Dean Weaver (EPC TE)? He promotes women elders (here) and, along the way:
1) Denies a functional hierarchy within the Trinity;
2) Implies that the Messianic offices of Priest and King submit to the office of Prophet;
3) Says that Anna (Lk. 2) and the daughters of Philip (Acts 21) were obviously “speaking the Word of God to the people of God in the assembly of God”;
4) Argues that, because Paul identifies himself as a διακονος (Col. 1:25) and because Paul “preached” (1:28), all deacons should preach; and
5) Suggests that Mary, Martha’s sister, was a rabbi in training
Now, such fanciful hermeneutics are not surprising when the goal is to defend one’s justification for egalitarianism. What is surprising (to me, anyway) is that he would be invited to conduct chapel services at RPTS: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IliJagaS1S4 [and, based on his words near the beginning of this video, this was not his first time there].
I admit that I know little about RPTS (other than what I have read on the PB, actually). Am I right to find this odd, or is it much ado about nothing (i.e., RPTS intentionally invites diverse speakers and just encourages the students to “eat the meat and spit out the bones”)?
1) Denies a functional hierarchy within the Trinity;
2) Implies that the Messianic offices of Priest and King submit to the office of Prophet;
3) Says that Anna (Lk. 2) and the daughters of Philip (Acts 21) were obviously “speaking the Word of God to the people of God in the assembly of God”;
4) Argues that, because Paul identifies himself as a διακονος (Col. 1:25) and because Paul “preached” (1:28), all deacons should preach; and
5) Suggests that Mary, Martha’s sister, was a rabbi in training
Now, such fanciful hermeneutics are not surprising when the goal is to defend one’s justification for egalitarianism. What is surprising (to me, anyway) is that he would be invited to conduct chapel services at RPTS: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IliJagaS1S4 [and, based on his words near the beginning of this video, this was not his first time there].
I admit that I know little about RPTS (other than what I have read on the PB, actually). Am I right to find this odd, or is it much ado about nothing (i.e., RPTS intentionally invites diverse speakers and just encourages the students to “eat the meat and spit out the bones”)?
Last edited: