Suppose there are two persons whose lives are at stake. If you are facing a ethical dilemma where you can only save either one of them, how would you response? What is the biblical approach to this? I think it's also related to trolley dilemma.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why is it an ethical dilemma? I’m not yet convinced I should save either.Suppose there are two persons whose lives are at stake. If you are facing a ethical dilemma where you can only save either one of them, how would you response? What is the biblical approach to this? I think it's also related to trolley dilemma.
That was a 'one vs many' issue. This is one on one. So I would think it is closer to the parachute joke.I think it's also related to trolley dilemma.
The ethical dilemma exercises are designed to promote just that, I think.My answer in these situations has always been to do nothing.
Still, you are control its direction.Plus, it is the trolley killing them and not you.
If the trolley is preset to one direction and you cannot stop it, you are not really in control. Thus victims are killed passively by the trolley and not actively/intentionally by your actions. You are not to become an active agent of doing evil.Still, you are control its direction.
Double effect.If the trolley is preset to one direction and you cannot stop it, you are not really in control. Thus victims are killed passively by the trolley and not actively/intentionally by your actions. You are not to become an active agent of doing evil.
Double-effect applies when you do not intend an evil action. But in the scenario, if you actively divert the trolley, you are almost always mentally choosing who dies. For that reason, in this and subsequent trolley scenarios, we cannot divert the trolley without moral guilt or, in later scenarios, throw the fat man off the bridge to stop the train.Double effect.