This morning I came across a message on Facebook that recommended a book bt Eugene Peterson (the author of the Bible translation "The Message")
I didn't want to let it go since it's not the first time this guy endorses "spiritual formation" writers, like Robert Foster and Phillip Yancey (what's worse, he is a professor at the Bible Seminary and, to some extent, I guess, a preacher)
So I replied that he shouldn't endorse Peterson, since he's into spiritual formation/Renovare, along to a link to the 1 star reviews of "The Message" on Amazon.
This is his answer:
"Come on Cristian G! The MESSAGE is not meant to replace the Bible - it is just a paraphrase that is mean to make the Bible more readable for some! It has its value alongside the more traditional translations!"
What do you guys think, how would you reply to this?
I should mention that I do not want to do anything in flesh, or speak without love. But I cannot understand how professors can take this lightly. And, from what I know, he is considered a conservative professor.
I can't help thinking about Paul Washer who used to say that on the judgment day, he would rather be a liberal politician than a conservative preacher.
Thx for all your posts
Cristian
I didn't want to let it go since it's not the first time this guy endorses "spiritual formation" writers, like Robert Foster and Phillip Yancey (what's worse, he is a professor at the Bible Seminary and, to some extent, I guess, a preacher)
So I replied that he shouldn't endorse Peterson, since he's into spiritual formation/Renovare, along to a link to the 1 star reviews of "The Message" on Amazon.
This is his answer:
"Come on Cristian G! The MESSAGE is not meant to replace the Bible - it is just a paraphrase that is mean to make the Bible more readable for some! It has its value alongside the more traditional translations!"
What do you guys think, how would you reply to this?
I should mention that I do not want to do anything in flesh, or speak without love. But I cannot understand how professors can take this lightly. And, from what I know, he is considered a conservative professor.
I can't help thinking about Paul Washer who used to say that on the judgment day, he would rather be a liberal politician than a conservative preacher.
Thx for all your posts
Cristian