Reformed Covenanter
Cancelled Commissioner
First of all let me say that I realise that not all people who are not convinced of EP would use the arguments that I hope to interact with.
After that qualification, let me get to the point. Does it not surprise you to hear opponents of EP, and this includes Reformed ministers, say things like we can't be EP because the Psalter does not tell us enough about Christ (Iain Murray), or that its wrong to be EP because of the imprecatory psalms (like Ps. 137) that speak of dashing the offspring of the wicked against the stones (Isaac Watts et al).
How are such views consistent with believing in the inerrancy of Scripture?
After that qualification, let me get to the point. Does it not surprise you to hear opponents of EP, and this includes Reformed ministers, say things like we can't be EP because the Psalter does not tell us enough about Christ (Iain Murray), or that its wrong to be EP because of the imprecatory psalms (like Ps. 137) that speak of dashing the offspring of the wicked against the stones (Isaac Watts et al).
How are such views consistent with believing in the inerrancy of Scripture?