Frame review of Horton's "Christless Christianity"

Status
Not open for further replies.
Partisan? I don't understand how my remarks can be construed as partisan. I have been trying to clarify and accurately present the Confessional language on whether or not it is a "minomer" to speak of one's response the the Gospel as obedience.

If one is a partisan himself, correction is often viewed as partisan.

Considering Rich's upfront professed fondness for Horton/WHI, and his clear effort to measure objectively whether a portion of Horton's theology has veered off some Reformed confessional track, we can easily judge the partisan charge ridiculous.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top