Going to Church By Staying at Home

Status
Not open for further replies.

VirginiaHuguenot

Puritanboard Librarian
Going to Church by Staying at Home
Clergy-Less Living Room Services Seen as a Growing Trend

By Michael Alison Chandler and Arianne Aryanpur
Washington Post Staff Writers
Sunday, June 4, 2006; Page A12

After Sunday dinner at Joe Rodgers's Rockville home, guests adjourn to the living room for church.

In his makeshift chapel, wooden kitchen stools and a floral print couch act as pews, a portable keyboard substitutes for an organ and the host, an electronics technician by day, serves as pastor.

But just as there is no formal name or dress code for this church, there is no sermon or pastor-led prayer. When it came time to bow their heads on a recent May evening, each of the 10 adults in attendance had something to contribute: One man prayed for success with his new fitness program; another sought guidance as he prepared for his upcoming marriage.

The worshipers have different faith backgrounds, including evangelical, Episcopalian and Catholic. What they share is a dissatisfaction with traditional church services.

"You can't ask questions in most churches. You might make an appointment with the pastor, get in his daybook for a quick lunch," said Rodgers, 50.

A growing number of Christians across Washington and around the country are moving to home churches -- both as a way to create personal connections in the age of the megachurch and as a return to the blueprint of the Christian church spelled out in the New Testament, which describes Jesus and the apostles teaching small groups in people's homes.

Estimates vary widely for a movement that is by design informal and decentralized, but the consensus among home-churchers is that they are part of a growing trend.

George Barna, a religion pollster, estimates that since 2000, more than 20 million Americans have begun exploring alternative forms of worship, including home churches, workplace ministries and online faith communities. Barna based that figure on surveys of the religious practices and attitudes of American adults that he has conducted over the past 25 years.

"These are people who are less interested in attending church than in being the church," said Barna, who became a home-churcher last year. The alternatives are attractive to those who want to deepen their relationships with God and one another, and they also suit Americans' growing taste for flexibility and control of their schedules, he said.

Although many Christians still participate in their old churches while trying out a new one, Barna predicts that over the next two decades, traditional churches will lose half their "market share" to these alternative start-ups.

His estimates far exceed the best guesses of home-church networks. The Orlando-based Dawn Ministries places the number of home churches in the United States in the tens of thousands, based partly on the size of online directories and attendance at home-church conferences.

Home churches are usually nondenominational and consist of a dozen or so friends or family members who often meet without an ordained pastor.

They have historically proliferated in countries with repressive regimes. In China, millions of people have converted to Christianity in unauthorized home churches over the past half-century. But the United States has seen only intermittent swells of activity.

The free-form style of fellowship got a boost in this country during the 1960s and 1970s with the hippie Jesus Movement and the Charismatic Renewal, a worldwide movement best known for embracing speaking in tongues and other emotional expressions of faith. Those movements downplayed hierarchy and emphasized broad participation.

The more recent rise of home churches has been facilitated by the Internet, said John White, a Denver-based coordinator for Dawn Ministries, one of several organizations that helps plant new home churches.

White said that when he tired of the "endless" church administration meetings and quit his job as a Presbyterian minister to start a home church eight years ago, it was difficult to find anyone to join. Now he has an e-mail list of more than 800 people nationwide who receive his postings about practical issues of home churching -- addressing such matters as how to organize child-friendly services, how to handle tithing, and what to do if the church gets too big.

With more access to religious information online, people are realizing that they don't have to rely on a pastor with an advanced degree to lead them, White said. Instead, they can learn how to create an alternative in a few steps. The result is an overall "flattening of the church," White said.

This is in keeping with God's plan to have a "kingdom of priests" in which everyone participates in his or her religious life, he said.

With next to no overhead, home churches are easy to set up. Dawn Ministries has been sending missionaries, or "coaches," to establish home churches around the world since 1985 and now has about 2,000 volunteers working in about 150 countries.

The model has been less successful in the United States -- until recently. Responding to the growing interest in home churches, over the past year the organization has increased the number of coaches working in North America from about five to 70, mostly in the Midwest, California, Texas and Colorado.

Critics of the home-church movement warn that, by meeting only in small groups with lay leaders, Christians could become disconnected and stray from orthodox beliefs.

"We human beings are prone to error; we need each other," said Scott Kisker, an associate professor of evangelism at Wesley Theological Seminary in Washington. He said that even the early home-based churches were connected through the apostles and that "many books of the New Testament are letters from the apostles calling churches to more faithful doctrine."

But Kisker said that a growing home-church movement could be good for traditional churches by encouraging them to foster small breakout groups, something he agreed is necessary for people to feel connected.

Many traditional churches do have midweek Bible study groups or cell churches. For some, these can be a first taste of home church, said Greg Windsor, a real estate developer and a member of the Rockville congregation that meets in Rodgers's home.

Windsor, 48, became interested in home churching almost 10 years ago while he was attending a megachurch in Montgomery County.

"The person sitting next to you in the pew could be close to dying, but people don't really know one another," he said. By abandoning the steeple, the pastor and the crowds of people, Windsor said, his tiny congregation is trying to live according to the New Testament.

"A lot of embellishments happened over the centuries," Windsor said. The modern Christian church is "like a photocopy of a photocopy of a photocopy of a photocopy," he said. "It starts getting distorted and changed."

Windsor and his wife started reading about home churches and broke off from a bigger church to meet with a group in northern Maryland. After several years, that group grew too large -- about 30 people -- and the couple broke off again, starting the home church in Rockville.

Stripped to its most basic elements, he said, his group can focus on developing "deep friendships" and "helping one another grow spiritually."

The service changes from week to week, depending on what members are going through or thinking about; they might organize a Bible study or discussion around managing their finances or overcoming depression.

On a recent Sunday, they watched a film by Focus on the Family that chronicles the lives of early Christians and their attempts to convert the Greeks. Afterward, they talked about how those experiences compare with challenges in spreading the faith today.

They sang hymns and put money into a small cardboard box, to be donated to homeless programs and victims of the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami. As the Communion bread and wine were passed around the circle, music played while others swayed and whispered "Oh God" and "Merciful God."

By about 9 p.m., it was time to go home. But Windsor said church does not end when the service is over. Members might meet several times during the week, and church can continue over coffee at Starbucks or during a biblical discussion at a family barbecue.

For them, church is not tied to a building or confined to a couple hours a week, he said. "It's a way of life."
 
Critics of the home-church movement warn that, by meeting only in small groups with lay leaders, Christians could become disconnected and stray from orthodox beliefs.
Hmmm...what critics would that be.

Let's see...Oh I just thougt of one:

GOD

'There are six days when you may work, but the seventh day is a Sabbath of rest, a day of sacred assembly. You are not to do any work; wherever you live, it is a Sabbath to the LORD.
 
I read the article in the Post yesterday. The bottom line? Home-churches in this nation are for convenience, not because of persecution.
 
Belgic Confession:

Article 28: The Obligations of Church Members

We believe that since this holy assembly and congregation is the gathering of those who are saved and there is no salvation apart from it, no one ought to withdraw from it, content to be by himself, regardless of his status or condition.

But all people are obliged to join and unite with it, keeping the unity of the church by submitting to its instruction and discipline, by bending their necks under the yoke of Jesus Christ, and by serving to build up one another, according to the gifts God has given them as members of each other in the same body.

And to preserve this unity more effectively, it is the duty of all believers, according to God's Word, to separate themselves from those who do not belong to the church, in order to join this assembly wherever God has established it, even if civil authorities and royal decrees forbid and death and physical punishment result.

And so, all who withdraw from the church or do not join it act contrary to God's ordinance.
 
I know of a group here locally that does this. Some who do this nearly take their condemnation of visible churches to Campingite heights.
 
Would it be accurate to say that Barna helped create the mega-church phenomenon with his years of polling about what people wanted in a church, and is now jumping on a bandwagon of sorts of those who see through the emptiness if the typical evangelical mega-church and are writing off the church altogether (i.e. the monster he helped create)?
 
How deep are your friendships if you leave when the church gets too large? Deep friendships --as long as there aren't too many of them?
Connectedness --with an exclusive elite?
 
Originally posted by py3ak
How deep are your friendships if you leave when the church gets too large? Deep friendships --as long as there aren't too many of them?
Connectedness --with an exclusive elite?

Well, I don't know about you, but it is difficult to have "deep friendships" with more than a handful of people. Just ask any pastor how many "deep friendships" he has with folks in his congregation.

The sad fact is that most churches, reformed included, are not a breeding ground for significant relationships. Pastors and elders tend to be overextended with with lots of "church work" -- committee meetings, visitations, community work -- because they have not effectively trained the congregation to do the work of ministry. Everyone expects the pastor to show up at their hospital door when there is illness, when, in reality, there is nothing a pastor can do that is beyond the capability of a properly trained Joe Member.

And how many churches have an effective ministry to men in the congregation that consistently breeds deep relationships?

Given the superficial and judgemental nature of most churches, it's not surprising that folks would rather stay home and gather with a few close friends.
 
Originally posted by SemperFideles
Critics of the home-church movement warn that, by meeting only in small groups with lay leaders, Christians could become disconnected and stray from orthodox beliefs.
Hmmm...what critics would that be.

Let's see...Oh I just thougt of one:

GOD

'There are six days when you may work, but the seventh day is a Sabbath of rest, a day of sacred assembly. You are not to do any work; wherever you live, it is a Sabbath to the LORD.

A small group of Christians gathering together is not a "sacred assembly"? And according to the verse you posted I could safely presume that you hold Saturday as the Sabbath?:detective:

And in all fairness, there could be a couple of very wise teachers IN a small group of people (house church). We have to lose this prejudice that all house churches contain a bunch of fools who don't know their left foot from their right eyeball.
 
A small group of Christians gathering together is not a "sacred assembly"?
No. The priests and Levites were charged with the preaching and teaching of the word. An informal gathering of egalitarians is not a sacred assembly.
And according to the verse you posted I could safely presume that you hold Saturday as the Sabbath?
We read the Old Testament with a New Testament understanding. We can, for example, read the passover text of the Old Testament and apply it to Christ, our passover, even if we do not eath physical lamb. The Christian Sabbath is Sunday, the Lord's Day, the day that light first broke forth.
And in all fairness, there could be a couple of very wise teachers IN a small group of people (house church). We have to lose this prejudice that all house churches contain a bunch of fools who don't know their left foot from their right eyeball.
It is true. But that does not mean that God has authorized them to perform ministerial functions, such as preaching the Word or adminstering the sacraments.

By analogy, a child may know a wise friend he get good advice from him. But that friend does not have authority over the child, as a parent might. A difference between these kinds of informal egalitarian assemblies and Christ's churches is that Christ has established and authorized the latter.

[Edited on 6-6-2006 by Scott]
 
Home church many times becomes a necessity.

The "sacred assembly" translates to my communion with the persons of God. He is a Spirit and is to be worshiped in Spirit and Truth. My faith may be different from your faith in terms of worship. I am not saying that communal worship is not important however.

Hypothetically, if someone believes that the Lord's Sabbath begins on Friday at sundown and ends on Saturday at sundown then one's "œsacred assembly" occurs during that time. This is an expression of one's faith that he believes is in accordance with the law. Sunday as the Christian Sabbath thus becomes "œabove & beyond" that which God has prescribed for Himself.

Home assemblies need only one teacher (His Spirit) and there is no need of any PhDs in this case. Home assemblies may just involve a father, a mother and any children. It can also be an individual thing between you and the Godhead.

It is dangerous ground to place judgment on home church simply because you are not The Judge. :2cents:

[Edited on 6-6-2006 by Texas Aggie]
 
Matt: House churches don´t have real church officers. To the extent they try, the officers are usurpers and pretenders. For that reason alone, a person should pay no more attention to these informal groups than to a stranger telling a child that he need not obey his parents.

A church needs officers. Christ started by ordaining apostles and investing them with authority to command the church. The apostles ordained elders. These elders in turn ordained other elders and deacons. The process for selecting officers is via the laying on of hands by previously ordained elders. An example is an Acts 6:5-6:
5This proposal pleased the whole group. They [the laity] chose Stephen, a man full of faith and of the Holy Spirit; also Philip, Procorus, Nicanor, Timon, Parmenas, and Nicolas from Antioch, a convert to Judaism. 6They presented these men to the apostles, who prayed and laid their hands on them.
This passage concerns deacons but the Bible prescribes the same process to elders too. Christ himself had invested the apostles with the authority to lay on hands, a biblical practice that means conveyance of authority. The apostles in turn ordained others, who in turn ordained others. Nobody else has that authority. For an individual or group to unlawfully claim that authority is usurpation. Christ did not vest this authority to informal, ever shifting, groups that come together to claim the name church.

That is one reason the apostles and elders endured much (including fasting, dangerous journeys, and the like) to ordain others. For example, Paul left an elder named Titus in Crete to appoint other elders: "The reason I left you in Crete was that you might straighten out what was left unfinished and appoint elders in every town, as I directed you." Titus 1:5. If every group had the inherent power to appoint officers, it would not have been necessary for Paul to leave an ordained elder to do the job.

Another thing to think about is that if the church had always been structured in informal, egalitarian groups with no formal connection to one another, the Bible would never have been written. There is no "Epistle to Whatever Informal Group Happens to Be Meeting at Joe's House This Week." There is the Epistle to the Romans. The Roman Christians may have been meeting in a house, but that is just incidental. Their structure was formal. They had real officers (elders, deacons) and were subject to visible apostolic jurisdiction and decision-making authority (in addition to doctrine).

[Edited on 6-6-2006 by Scott]
 
Originally posted by Scott
Matt: House churches don´t have real church officers. To the extent they try, the officers are usurpers and pretenders. For that reason alone, a person should pay no more attention to these informal groups than to a stranger telling a child that he need not obey his parents.

A church needs officers. Christ started by ordaining apostles and investing them with authority to command the church. The apostles ordained elders. These elders in turn ordained other elders and deacons. The process for selecting officers is via the laying on of hands by previously ordained elders. An example is an Acts 6:5-6:

...


Would it be your opinion that the officers in any independent/congregational/baptistic church are not properly ordained and therefore "usurpers and pretenders"?
 
Why Small Groups?

Actually, quite a few of the Presbyterian churches in my area, particularly Lynchburg are small or home churches.

I don't think the problem of cultivating friendships is with the scale of the churches, but rather how big churches accommodate their size, and manage their fellowship. If a church plans on three big services/gatherings per week; the key perhaps is not having Wednesday services quite like traditional ones, and trying to focus more on small groups, which cultivate better fellowship. The fellowship might not even be at the church itself, but in various groups and at home. Sure, Sunday School is supposed to do that, but sometimes the formality of the regular services carries into Sunday School, and doesn't allow for deeper fellowship. The small groups focus eliminates the hang-ups of church, and gives more balance to fellowship without robbing traditional Sabbath worship of its solemnity.

C.J. Mahaney of Sovereign Grace Ministries wrote a good book Why Small Groups?, and his churches and affiliated ministries actually do a very good job with these various groups. The key is to get "plugged in" and take advantage of those groups.

I'm not sure about all the particulars of their ministry as far as doctrine (i.e. they are basically Wayne Grudem charismatic Calvinists), but they do an excellent job with provision for small groups, given the size of their churches. Thus, all things considered, they offer a dynamic models for other churches to emulate, concerning fellowship and small groups. Consider reading Mahaney's book. It's free online!!! Open Adobe Acrobat and read it!

We're designed for fellowship, and we ought to explore the most meaningful ways of pursuing that fellowship.
:2cents:

[Edited on 6-7-2006 by Puritanhead]
 
BTW For clarification, I'm not advocating people not going to church, but rather perhaps integrating home-based small groups into their church's fellowship program.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top