Can this man's one doctrine on 'The End of the Church Age' mean that ALL his other doctrines are false? Or is it possible that there can still be some truth coming out of this man's mouth?
Can one doctrine so taint a man's teaching that no truth can possibly come out of him again? If so, where do we draw the line between a false doctrine that can be tolerated and a false doctrine that cannot be tolerated?
Can one doctrine so taint a man's teaching that no truth can possibly come out of him again? If so, where do we draw the line between a false doctrine that can be tolerated and a false doctrine that cannot be tolerated?