Friends (Dr. Clark & others),
I have a couple questions concerning Heinrich Bullinger that I would appreciate your thoughts on. I have read in several sources that Bullinger´s work was very influential during the time of the Westminster Assembly, possibly more so even than Calvin´s (especially as it relates to the development of the covenant as an organizing principle). Do you believe that to be true? If so, why did Bullinger´s influence (and work) not carry forward with at least the same prominence as Calvin´s? Other than the Second Helvetic, any recommendations on his works?
Thank you for your help!
I have a couple questions concerning Heinrich Bullinger that I would appreciate your thoughts on. I have read in several sources that Bullinger´s work was very influential during the time of the Westminster Assembly, possibly more so even than Calvin´s (especially as it relates to the development of the covenant as an organizing principle). Do you believe that to be true? If so, why did Bullinger´s influence (and work) not carry forward with at least the same prominence as Calvin´s? Other than the Second Helvetic, any recommendations on his works?
Thank you for your help!