Scot
Puritan Board Sophomore
O.k., I'm reading "End Times Fiction" by Demar and I have a question. I'll admit that I haven't studied alot on the different views of eschatology, so maybe some of you guys that have studied more can help me out.
Right now in the book, I'm going through the explanation of Matthew 24. Everything makes good sense until I get to Matthew 14:15-16. The part that I'm having trouble with is the "abomination of desolation" standing in the "holy place."
Of course, Demar talks about the Roman soldiers offering sacrifices to their heathen gods at the temple.
My question is "Didn't the temple cease to be a holy place at Christ's death?"
If so, then the action of the Roman soldiers could not have been a fullfilment of this prophecy. The temple was no longer considered a holy place when they committed these acts.
Any comments/explanations?
(Sorry if this has been covered before)
Right now in the book, I'm going through the explanation of Matthew 24. Everything makes good sense until I get to Matthew 14:15-16. The part that I'm having trouble with is the "abomination of desolation" standing in the "holy place."
Of course, Demar talks about the Roman soldiers offering sacrifices to their heathen gods at the temple.
My question is "Didn't the temple cease to be a holy place at Christ's death?"
If so, then the action of the Roman soldiers could not have been a fullfilment of this prophecy. The temple was no longer considered a holy place when they committed these acts.
Any comments/explanations?
(Sorry if this has been covered before)