Afterthought
Puritan Board Senior
Sorry for posting so much so quickly. I'm not ignoring what I've already posted or what others have replied to what I've posted, but I wanted to get this thread out while I thought about the other posts/replies.
I had two kinds of questions. Firstly, what is the chain of reasoning used to prove that people are imputed guilt in Adam in Romans 5? I bet Murray's book works, but is there any quick way of showing it in Romans 5 so that I could show it to someone I was trying to prove it to? Is it valid to use this kind of reasoning for 1 Corinthians 15: In Adam all died, therefore, in Adam all sinned because death is the punishment for sin? And then, what can we say to people who agree people are born sinful or sin early on in life, but that they are not imputed the guilt of Adam's sin (that is, they agree people are born corrupt but that they are not imputed the guilt of Adam's sin)? It seems strange to me to separate imputed guilt from inherited corruption, but how can we show it is wrong?
Secondly, I understand that in Romans 5 it says "death by sin," and this is used to show death in general (including animal death) came by sin, but doesn't the context show that Paul is speaking about human death only there? He is saying that death is the penalty for sinning, yet we don't say animals sinned in Adam or sin because of Adam.
Thanks for any help!
I had two kinds of questions. Firstly, what is the chain of reasoning used to prove that people are imputed guilt in Adam in Romans 5? I bet Murray's book works, but is there any quick way of showing it in Romans 5 so that I could show it to someone I was trying to prove it to? Is it valid to use this kind of reasoning for 1 Corinthians 15: In Adam all died, therefore, in Adam all sinned because death is the punishment for sin? And then, what can we say to people who agree people are born sinful or sin early on in life, but that they are not imputed the guilt of Adam's sin (that is, they agree people are born corrupt but that they are not imputed the guilt of Adam's sin)? It seems strange to me to separate imputed guilt from inherited corruption, but how can we show it is wrong?
Secondly, I understand that in Romans 5 it says "death by sin," and this is used to show death in general (including animal death) came by sin, but doesn't the context show that Paul is speaking about human death only there? He is saying that death is the penalty for sinning, yet we don't say animals sinned in Adam or sin because of Adam.
Thanks for any help!
Last edited: