I've had one of my frustrating headaches where I end up with a pillow over my head trying to block out light and sound; at least this provides time to think, and this is where I went:
First puzzle: As finite beings, we are hampered in our ability to envision the attributes of God that are infinite such as his omnipresence and omnipotence. No matter how good the teaching, no matter how much I study and think, I eventually come to the limits of my very finite brain and simply cannot understand God in His infinity. It's like being the gum inside of jawbreaker candy. The gum has no ability to work its way outside of the candy shell; even if it could, it would not be larger than the original jawbreaker.
Second puzzle: We run up against violations of the second commandment when our understanding of God does not fully mesh with what he reveals about himself in the Bible. But as a finite being, I cannot think of infinity. In this age,we have a ready answer: Since Jesus condescended to come to earth as a finite human being but maintained being fully (therefore infinite) God, He provides the bridge that enables us to relate to an infinite God.
Third puzzle: If it is a violation of the second commandment to think incorrectly about God (and we cannot think of Him in his infinity) what was Adam's status before the fall? And what happens to us on this point in the new earth when we will no longer be encumbered by sin? We will never be infinite. We will never be able to stretch our brains far enough. But we know sin did not exist for man prior to the fall and will not exist in the new earth. Will the standard be that our understanding of God will be sufficient, and glorifying to Him, as long as it is consistent with what He has revealed, though limited by our natural abilities?
Food (or jawbreakers!) for thought ...
First puzzle: As finite beings, we are hampered in our ability to envision the attributes of God that are infinite such as his omnipresence and omnipotence. No matter how good the teaching, no matter how much I study and think, I eventually come to the limits of my very finite brain and simply cannot understand God in His infinity. It's like being the gum inside of jawbreaker candy. The gum has no ability to work its way outside of the candy shell; even if it could, it would not be larger than the original jawbreaker.
Second puzzle: We run up against violations of the second commandment when our understanding of God does not fully mesh with what he reveals about himself in the Bible. But as a finite being, I cannot think of infinity. In this age,we have a ready answer: Since Jesus condescended to come to earth as a finite human being but maintained being fully (therefore infinite) God, He provides the bridge that enables us to relate to an infinite God.
Third puzzle: If it is a violation of the second commandment to think incorrectly about God (and we cannot think of Him in his infinity) what was Adam's status before the fall? And what happens to us on this point in the new earth when we will no longer be encumbered by sin? We will never be infinite. We will never be able to stretch our brains far enough. But we know sin did not exist for man prior to the fall and will not exist in the new earth. Will the standard be that our understanding of God will be sufficient, and glorifying to Him, as long as it is consistent with what He has revealed, though limited by our natural abilities?
Food (or jawbreakers!) for thought ...