D
Deleted member 12919 by request
Guest
Since it’s fresh in the minds of many, I’d like to posit another question. I’m not asserting this to be true; I am curious to hear your thoughts.
Are there similarities between TR-Onlyism and KJV-Onlyism? Is there a relationship?
By “TR-Onlyism” I mean the position that states that the TR is all we should use, and anything else is to be shunned—and that it is an issue that churches should divide over.
You could also call it dogmatic Confessional Bibliology or extreme Confessional Bibliology.
Are any arguments the same?
Are any assertions the same?
Is TR-Onlyism functionally KJV-Onlyism?
Is TR-Onlyism ever simply IFB spirit and argumentation in Reformed garb?
Are any presuppositions, arguments, or fruit the same?
Again, I am not claiming this. I want to hear from others.
Are there similarities between TR-Onlyism and KJV-Onlyism? Is there a relationship?
By “TR-Onlyism” I mean the position that states that the TR is all we should use, and anything else is to be shunned—and that it is an issue that churches should divide over.
You could also call it dogmatic Confessional Bibliology or extreme Confessional Bibliology.
Are any arguments the same?
Are any assertions the same?
Is TR-Onlyism functionally KJV-Onlyism?
Is TR-Onlyism ever simply IFB spirit and argumentation in Reformed garb?
Are any presuppositions, arguments, or fruit the same?
Again, I am not claiming this. I want to hear from others.