Solparvus
Puritan Board Senior
This morning was a morning where I was hoping that perhaps the intro/extro distinction isn't real. I found this from @Rev. Todd Ruddell in an old thread:
"I would also like to give a hearty Amen! to the concept of not letting modern psychological constructs define us. Many of those who claim to be psychologists have an unbiblical view of proper anthropology. Such labels as introvert, extrovert, etc. may be helpful in identifying temporary trends in our desires and comforts, but these are not definitive, nor necessarily permanent."
I'm wondering if someone might be able to flesh out the worldly anthropology that plays into these categories like intro/extro as compared to Biblical anthropology, or the Meyers Briggs assessments, and where maybe these hard distinctions break down Biblically.
"I would also like to give a hearty Amen! to the concept of not letting modern psychological constructs define us. Many of those who claim to be psychologists have an unbiblical view of proper anthropology. Such labels as introvert, extrovert, etc. may be helpful in identifying temporary trends in our desires and comforts, but these are not definitive, nor necessarily permanent."
I'm wondering if someone might be able to flesh out the worldly anthropology that plays into these categories like intro/extro as compared to Biblical anthropology, or the Meyers Briggs assessments, and where maybe these hard distinctions break down Biblically.