Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He will be glorified even by the judgment that those who did not glorify Him
will receive
Chief end: What he was created for--his designed role but for sin.
So, yes, that applies to every man.
This entry in the WCF has always struck me as so vague that it has to be qualified.
The only sort of similar verse I've ever found is: "Fear God and keep his commandments, for this is the whole duty of man." Eccl. 12:13b ESV
Chief end: What he was created for--his designed role but for sin.
So, yes, that applies to every man.
Thank you, Victor. That is what I was getting at, I just wanted to make sure we answered the question in the OP completely. We glorify God even in our judgment, but only the elect can truly enjoy him forever.
This statement is found in the Shorter and Larger Catechisms. What about it seems vague? I think the appended prooftexts are very good examples of this teaching found in the Scriptures (Rom. 11:36; 1 Cor. 10:31; Ps. 73:24-28; John 17:21-23).
What is the conclusion of the Psalms on the matter? "Let every thing that hath breath praise the LORD. Praise ye the LORD."
Thank you for today's chuckle. Every post in this thread which attempted to clarify or explain what they think this catechism question/answer meant means the original was vague.What about it seems vague? I think the appended prooftexts are very good examples of this teaching found in the Scriptures (Rom. 11:36; 1 Cor. 10:31; Ps. 73:24-28; John 17:21-23).
before and after God tells His chosen people to not forget why He saves them.KJV said:A new heart also will I give you, and a new spirit will I put within you: and I will take away the stony heart out of your flesh, and I will give you an heart of flesh. And I will put my spirit within you, and cause you to walk in my statutes, and ye shall keep my judgments, and do them. And ye shall dwell in the land that I gave to your fathers; and ye shall be my people, and I will be your God. (Ezek. 36:26-28)
KJV said:Therefore say unto the house of Israel, Thus saith the Lord GOD; I do not this for your sakes, O house of Israel, but for mine holy name's sake, which ye have profaned among the heathen, whither ye went. And I will sanctify my great name, which was profaned among the heathen, which ye have profaned in the midst of them; and the heathen shall know that I am the LORD, saith the Lord GOD, when I shall be sanctified in you before their eyes. (Ezek. 36:22,23)
KJV said:Not for your sakes do I this, saith the Lord GOD, be it known unto you: be ashamed and confounded for your own ways, O house of Israel. (Ezek. 36:32)
Thank you for today's chuckle. Every post in this thread which attempted to clarify or explain what they think this catechism question/answer meant means the original was vague.
But I don't believe that the Catechism intends for each question to be completely self contained.
I think the point of the question/answer is to state what is the revealed will of God concerning his purpose for man's existence. I don't think it even starts to touch on what those who turn their backs on that purpose may receive if they persist.
Those in hell are/will not "enjoy" God forever. Eternal life is the designated, ideal end of creation; but not life as an end in itself. God himself is the summum bonum, and man is fulfilled in glorifying God.
Rev. Bruce are the proof text official? If so, it appears they are used to "start to touch on what those who turn their backs".
Rev. Bruce are the proof text official? If so, it appears they are used to "start to touch on what those who turn their backs".
Earl,
The OPC has a particular set of prooftexts which were "officially" adopted some years ago. Those texts are not themselves constitutional, belonging as they do to a superior category, to which the Constitution of this church is subject.
The proofs adduced above by Bryan (post #8, thank you sir) are not all those or only those adopted by the OPC. None of the OPC's proofs so much as mention the wicked. Now, of those that referenced in the above, I found one verse, Ps.73:27 (in the midst of a longer citation) that contrasts the reward of the righteous with that of the wicked.
I cannot tell the publisher of those proofs; I cannot tell if v27 "belongs" to the citation (consider the FCS's original West. Stds. edition often elides extraneous matter in their precise proofs). And many varieties of the prooftexts exist, for there have been many publishers of the Shorter Catechism, both individual and ecclesiastic. In any case, the value of v27 would be as it is contrasted with the emphatic blessings insured to the godly.
Just taking the Q&A on its own terms, the focus clearly is upon "ought," not "is." I think the question is reflective of the way Calvin begins his Institutes, by showing that there is an inextricable link between the fundamental questions: "who am I?" and "who is God?"
Q. 45. Is our happiness, in the enjoyment of God, to be our chief end?
A. No; but the glory of God itself, Isa. 42:8; in our aiming at which chiefly, we cannot miss the enjoyment of him, Psalm 91:14, 15.
Q. 46. Is not our delighting in the glory of God, to be reckoned our chief end?
A. No; we must set the glory of God above our delight therein, otherwise, our delight is not chiefly in God, but in ourselves, Isa. 2:11. Our subjective delighting in the glory of God belongs to the enjoyment of him, whose glory is above the heavens, and infinitely above our delight therein, Psalm 113:4.